IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/gender/v30y2023i1p18-34.html

“They wouldn't get away with it at McDonalds”: Decriminalization, work, and disciplinary power in New Zealand brothels

Author

Listed:
  • Claire Weinhold
  • Gillian Abel
  • Lee Thompson

Abstract

New Zealand decriminalized sex work in 2004 with the passage of the Prostitution Reform Act (2003), which sets an explicit intention to prevent exploitation of sex workers and improve their welfare. This has demonstrably improved conditions for sex workers and provides a necessary context for addressing exploitation. However, little research has looked at how this works for brothel‐based sex workers in New Zealand. This paper responds to that gap by examining how brothel operators in New Zealand exercise power and control and how sex workers experience that. The study draws on in‐depth interviews conducted across New Zealand with 33 participants. These include staff from the New Zealand Sex Workers' Collective (2), brothel‐based sex workers (18), operators (8), and sex worker/operators (5). We use a Foucauldian framework and Foucauldian Discourse Analysis to examine how disciplinary power informs brothel management, prompting the production of normative discourses of work that destabilize sex workers' safety at work. We conclude that decriminalization nevertheless provides an essential framework by which sex workers are able to resist disciplinary control (W/C 171).

Suggested Citation

  • Claire Weinhold & Gillian Abel & Lee Thompson, 2023. "“They wouldn't get away with it at McDonalds”: Decriminalization, work, and disciplinary power in New Zealand brothels," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 18-34, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:30:y:2023:i:1:p:18-34
    DOI: 10.1111/gwao.12893
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12893
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/gwao.12893?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wendy Bastalich, 2009. "Reading Foucault: Genealogy and Social Science Research Methodology and Ethics," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 14(2), pages 81-90, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Isabella Scheibmayr, 2024. "Organizing vulnerability exploring Judith Butler's conceptualization of vulnerability to study organizations," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1385-1408, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anja Bless & Federico Davila & Roel Plant, 2023. "A genealogy of sustainable agriculture narratives: implications for the transformative potential of regenerative agriculture," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(4), pages 1379-1397, December.
    2. Kristina Auxtova & Mary Brennan & Stephen Dunne, 2021. "To Be or Not to Be Governed Like That? Harmful and/or Offensive Advertising Complaints in the United Kingdom’s (Self-) Regulatory Context," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 172(3), pages 425-446, September.
    3. Soh-Young Chung, 2011. "The Modality of the Textual Institutionalisation of Literary Studies: Towards a Sociology of Literature," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 16(3), pages 15-27, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:30:y:2023:i:1:p:18-34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0968-6673 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.