IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/finmgt/v48y2019i2p441-472.html

Are specialist funds “special”?

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Fricke

Abstract

In this paper, I explore the relation between portfolio overlap and performance diversity. Using data on actively managed U.S. equity mutual funds, I find that the pairwise portfolio overlap between individual funds has increased over time and is significant compared to various randomized benchmarks. These findings motivate the main question of this paper, namely whether specialist funds (those with low levels of portfolio overlap with other funds) differ significantly from funds with high levels of overlap. Here, I find that these specialists differ with regard to certain portfolio‐ and fund‐specific characteristics, but they do not appear to outperform other funds.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Fricke, 2019. "Are specialist funds “special”?," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 48(2), pages 441-472, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:finmgt:v:48:y:2019:i:2:p:441-472
    DOI: 10.1111/fima.12257
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/fima.12257
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/fima.12257?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fricke, Daniel & Wilke, Hannes, 2020. "Connected Funds," VfS Annual Conference 2020 (Virtual Conference): Gender Economics 224511, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    2. Caccioli, Fabio & Ferrara, Gerardo & Ramadiah, Amanah, 2024. "Modelling fire sale contagion across banks and non-banks," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    3. Yoshihiko Hogen & Yoshiyasu Koide & Yuji Shinozaki, 2022. "Rise of NBFIs and the Global Structural Change in the Transmission of Market Shocks," Bank of Japan Working Paper Series 22-E-14, Bank of Japan.
    4. Danilo Delpini & Stefano Battiston & Guido Caldarelli & Massimo Riccaboni, 2019. "Systemic risk from investment similarities," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-15, May.
    5. Yoshiyasu Koide & Yoshihiko Hogen & Nao Sudo, 2022. "Increasing Portfolio Overlap of Japanese Regional Banks with Global Investment Funds and Its Financial Stability Implications," Bank of Japan Working Paper Series 22-E-15, Bank of Japan.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • G1 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets
    • G2 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:finmgt:v:48:y:2019:i:2:p:441-472. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fmaaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.