IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ecaffa/v39y2019i2p243-250.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why comparative advantage is a problematic guide to practical policy

Author

Listed:
  • Sherman Xie

Abstract

Previous criticisms of comparative advantage theory have mainly stressed the inapplicability of its theoretical assumptions. This article focuses on the dilemma involved in using it as a guide to practical policy. Since its inception, comparative advantage theory has gradually split into two schools, representing two ways of thinking and two methodologies. Economic policy based on comparative advantage may succeed in the short run but fail in the long run, because the development model based on this approach has an inherent destructive mechanism.

Suggested Citation

  • Sherman Xie, 2019. "Why comparative advantage is a problematic guide to practical policy," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(2), pages 243-250, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ecaffa:v:39:y:2019:i:2:p:243-250
    DOI: 10.1111/ecaf.12347
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecaf.12347
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ecaf.12347?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Toraubally, Waseem A., 2022. "Strategic trading and Ricardian comparative advantage," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 428-447.
    2. Sherman Xie & Lin Xia, 2022. "Advantage integration: A methodological framework for growth and development," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(3), pages 1393-1410, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ecaffa:v:39:y:2019:i:2:p:243-250. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0265-0665 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.