IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/devchg/v30y1999i3p525-555.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gendering Poverty: A Review of Six World Bank African Poverty Assessments

Author

Listed:
  • Ann Whitehead
  • Matthew Lockwood

Abstract

Since the late 1980s, Poverty Assessments have emerged as the most important statements by the World Bank about poverty in particular countries. This article examines, in some depth, a set of Assessments from four sub‐Saharan African countries from a gender perspective. These Assessments display an enormous variation in the extent to which gender is present, and they also show a sharp contrast between the treatment of gender issues in the measurement of poverty, particularly in the participatory elements of the Assessments, and their absence in the policy sections of the documents. The article goes on to analyse why the inclusion of gender in these World Bank country‐specific poverty documents has been so problematic. In the absence of a clear analytical framework in the Bank for understanding gender, its treatment in the Assessments is driven on the one hand by a set of epistemological and methodological choices about measuring poverty, and on the other hand, by a set of prescriptions for reducing poverty which originate in the Bank's 1990 World Development Report. The key conclusion of the paper is that it is impossible to integrate gender into an understanding of poverty unless the reading of evidence, analysis and policy are all based on relational processes of impoverishment or accumulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Ann Whitehead & Matthew Lockwood, 1999. "Gendering Poverty: A Review of Six World Bank African Poverty Assessments," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 30(3), pages 525-555, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:devchg:v:30:y:1999:i:3:p:525-555
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-7660.00128
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00128
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-7660.00128?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bipasha Baruah, 2009. "Monitoring progress towards gender-equitable poverty alleviation," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 9(3), pages 171-186, July.
    2. Michael J.G. Parnwell, 2003. "Consulting the poor in Thailand: enlightenment or delusion?," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 3(2), pages 99-112, April.
    3. Parker, Barbara & Kozel, Valerie, 2007. "Understanding Poverty and Vulnerability in India's Uttar Pradesh and Bihar: A Q-squared Approach," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 296-311, February.
    4. Chant, Sylvia, 2003. "New contributions to the analysis of poverty: methodological and conceptual challenges to understanding poverty from a gender perspective," Asuntos de Género 5910, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    5. A. Haroon Akram-Lodhi, 2002. ""All Decisions Are Top-Down:" Engendering Public Expenditure in Vietnam," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(3), pages 1-19.
    6. Chhachhi, A. & Truong, T.-D., 2009. "Gender, poverty and social justice," ISS Working Papers - General Series 18711, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:devchg:v:30:y:1999:i:3:p:525-555. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0012-155X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.