IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ajecsc/v78y2019i5p1043-1069.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Editor’s Introduction: The Social Problem of Monopoly

Author

Listed:
  • Clifford W. Cobb

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Clifford W. Cobb, 2019. "Editor’s Introduction: The Social Problem of Monopoly," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 78(5), pages 1043-1069, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:78:y:2019:i:5:p:1043-1069
    DOI: 10.1111/ajes.12305
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajes.12305
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ajes.12305?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Saez, Emmanuel & Zucman, Gabriel, 2014. "Wealth Inequality in the United States since 1913: Evidence from Capitalized Income Tax Data," CEPR Discussion Papers 10227, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Franklin Obeng-Odoom, 2023. "Spatial political economy: the case of metropolitan industrial policy," Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 137-163, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elinder, Mikael & Erixson, Oscar & Waldenström, Daniel, 2018. "Inheritance and wealth inequality: Evidence from population registers," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 17-30.
    2. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/5qjkarlp3e8a2a40vbqo698d3v is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Mengus , Eric & Pancrazi , Roberto, 2015. "The Inequality Accelerator," HEC Research Papers Series 1108, HEC Paris.
    4. Junyi Zhu, 2014. "Bracket Creep Revisited - with and without r > g: Evidence from Germany," Journal of Income Distribution, Ad libros publications inc., vol. 23(3), pages 106-158, November.
    5. Wookjae Heo & John E. Grable & Barbara O’Neill, 2017. "Wealth Accumulation Inequality: Does Investment Risk Tolerance and Equity Ownership Drive Wealth Accumulation?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 133(1), pages 209-225, August.
    6. Clément Bellet, 2017. "Essays on Inequality, Social Preferences and Consumer Behavior," Sciences Po publications info:hdl:2441/vbu6kd1s68o, Sciences Po.
    7. Philippe De Donder & John E. Roemer, 2017. "The dynamics of capital accumulation in the US: simulations after piketty," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 15(2), pages 121-141, June.
    8. Facundo Alvaredo & Anthony Atkinson & Lucas Chancel & Thomas Piketty & Emmanuel Saez & Gabriel Zucman, 2016. "Distributional National Accounts (DINA) Guidelines : Concepts and Methods used in WID.world," Working Papers halshs-02794308, HAL.
    9. Xavier Gabaix & Jean‐Michel Lasry & Pierre‐Louis Lions & Benjamin Moll, 2016. "The Dynamics of Inequality," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 84, pages 2071-2111, November.
    10. Jan Behringer & Till van Treeck, 2018. "Varieties of capitalism and growth regimes: the role of income distribution," IMK Working Paper 194-2018, IMK at the Hans Boeckler Foundation, Macroeconomic Policy Institute.
    11. Till van Treeck, 2015. "r>g: Why the ‘Piketty Debate’ Unsettles Germany’s Economic Experts," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 16(1), pages 26-34, May.
    12. No authors listed, 2017. "Will Wealth Become More Concentrated in Europe?," Working Paper Reihe der AK Wien - Materialien zu Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft 172, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik.
    13. Venkatasubramanian, Venkat & Luo, Yu & Sethuraman, Jay, 2015. "How much inequality in income is fair? A microeconomic game theoretic perspective," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 435(C), pages 120-138.
    14. Rishabh Kumar, 2015. "Wealth accumulation and aggregate demand stagnation in a two class economy with applications to the United States," Working Papers 1526, New School for Social Research, Department of Economics.
    15. Rishabh Kumar, 2016. "Personal Savings from Top Incomes and Household Wealth Accumulation in the United States," International Journal of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(3), pages 224-240, July.
    16. Piketty Thomas, 2015. "Capital, Inequality and Justice: Reflections on Capital in the Twenty-First Century," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 141-156, June.
    17. Alexis Akira Toda & Kieran James Walsh & Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh, 2020. "The Equity Premium and the One Percent [Stock return predictability: Is it there?]," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 33(8), pages 3583-3623.
    18. Thomas Piketty, 2015. "A Historical Approach to Property, Inequality and Debt: Reflections on Capital in the 21st Century," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 16(01), pages 40-49, May.
    19. Soon Ryoo, 2016. "Inequality of Income and Wealth in the Long Run: A Kaldorian Perspective," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(2), pages 429-457, May.
    20. Gérard Duménil & Dominique Lévy, 2015. "Neoliberal Managerial Capitalism," International Journal of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(2), pages 71-89, April.
    21. Chatzouz, Moustafa, 2014. "Government Debt and Wealth Inequality: Theory and Insights from Altruism," MPRA Paper 77007, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:78:y:2019:i:5:p:1043-1069. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0002-9246 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.