IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/agecon/v20y1999i3p203-214.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of agricultural and household technologies on women: a conceptual and quantitative analysis in Burkina Faso

Author

Listed:
  • Pareena G. Lawrence
  • John H. Sanders
  • Sunder Ramaswamy

Abstract

Agricultural technologies (new cultivars, inorganic fertilizers, soil‐and water‐conservation techniques) in Sub‐Saharan Africa have been primarily introduced to male farmers by male‐dominated extension services on the family plots. These yield‐increasing, input‐intensive technologies increase the demand for farm labor. So, not only do men obtain most of the direct benefits from the introduction of technology but this labor‐intensive technology also increases the demands on women's time for additional labor. This raises the question: Are the combined effects of agricultural technologies beneficial or detrimental to women? We first develop a labor‐market model that examines the impact of agricultural and household technologies on labor allocation and income determination within the household. We then discuss the important issue of how household labor‐allocation decisions and division of income are made within the family in Sub‐Saharan Africa. We use a programming model to estimate the effects of these technologies on household incomes and the income of women. The results indicate that the impact of agricultural technologies depends on the type of decision‐making prevailing in the household. In contrast, household technologies increase the welfare of women regardless of the type of decision‐making. However, with bargaining behavior, agricultural technologies do benefit women and there is some empirical support for this type of household behavior in Sub‐Saharan African households.

Suggested Citation

  • Pareena G. Lawrence & John H. Sanders & Sunder Ramaswamy, 1999. "The impact of agricultural and household technologies on women: a conceptual and quantitative analysis in Burkina Faso," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 20(3), pages 203-214, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:agecon:v:20:y:1999:i:3:p:203-214
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-0862.1999.tb00567.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.1999.tb00567.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1574-0862.1999.tb00567.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Haider, Hamza & Smale, Melinda & Theriault, Veronique, 2018. "Intensification and intrahousehold decisions: Fertilizer adoption in Burkina Faso," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 310-320.
    2. Aminata Diagne & Lota Tamini & Patrick Mundler, 2019. "Factors Explaining the Dynamics of Agricultural Technology Adoption: Evidence from Senegal's Rain Maize Farmers," CIRANO Working Papers 2019s-08, CIRANO.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:agecon:v:20:y:1999:i:3:p:203-214. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.