IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcy/issued/cognitivesustainabilityv4y2025i4p45-58.html

Sovereign green bond reporting practices in the EU: a harmonised or fragmented landscape?

Author

Listed:
  • BenceLukács

    (Government Debt Management Agency Private Company Limited by Shares, Sustainable Finance Department, Budapest, Hungary)

Abstract

In order to meet the growing funding needs of green transition in the European Union, member states started issuing green bonds. On the green bond market, sovereigns are expected to report on the use of the green bond proceeds and their impact. Several voluntary guidelines are available for green bond reporting on the market, including the International Capital Market Association Green Bond Principles (ICMA GBP) or the European Union Green Bond Standard (EuGBS), which is based on the EU Taxonomy. This study provides an overview on the current sovereign green bond reporting practices in the EU, taking into account their most recent green bond reports and related documents (green bond frameworks, external reviews etc.). The results show that all sovereigns in the EU implement the ICMA GBP, while many strive to comply with the criteria of the EU Taxonomy and EuGBS on a best effort basis. Due to the voluntary use of the standards, the reporting practices among sovereigns greatly vary: each country uses its own approach for EU Taxonomy assessment, allocation and impact reporting, which leads to market fragmentation and limited comparability of the sovereign green bonds. The EuGBS could create a common ground for reporting requirements by strengthening comparability and credibility and improving the transparency on the market. However, due to its strict requirements such as the alignment with the EU Taxonomy, it is complicated for sovereigns to comply with the standard.

Suggested Citation

  • BenceLukács, 2025. "Sovereign green bond reporting practices in the EU: a harmonised or fragmented landscape?," Cognitive Sustainability, Cognitive Sustainability Ltd., vol. 4(4), pages 45-58, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bcy:issued:cognitivesustainability:v:4:y:2025:i:4:p:45-58
    DOI: 10.55343/CogSust.20624
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ojs.mtak.hu/index.php/CogSust/article/view/20624/17644
    Download Restriction: -

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.55343/CogSust.20624?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • F34 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - International Lending and Debt Problems
    • H63 - Public Economics - - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt - - - Debt; Debt Management; Sovereign Debt

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcy:issued:cognitivesustainability:v:4:y:2025:i:4:p:45-58. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Prof. Mate ZOLDY (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.CogSust.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.