IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bau/ijabms/v1y2016i1id258.html

Do causes and consequences of stress affect genders differently at operational level? Comparison of the IT sectors in the UK and Pakistan

Author

Listed:
  • Adnan ul Haque

    (University of Wales Trinity Saint David, London, United Kingdom)

  • John Aston

    (Brunel University London)

  • Eugene Kozlovski

Abstract

The aim is examining the variation in causes and consequences of stress among contrasting gender in IT sector of Karachi (Pakistan) and London (UK). The potential impact of stressors on the organisational commitment of employees are examined through self-constructed 'stress model'. Through snowball and purposive sampling techniques, total 419 respondents (205 from Karachi and 214 from London) were targeted to attain quantitative perspective through on-line matrix based semi-structured survey questionnaire. Results showed that there is significant difference in causes of stress among contrasting gender. Moreover, male workers experience higher stress than females at operational level. Further, London workforce experience lower stress than Karachi workforce due to social support programme at workplace. There is significant variation in causes of stress as findings showed personal factors are leading stressors for females while organisational and environmental factors causes stress for males. Job demand, leadership, and economic uncertainty are negatively affecting male's organisational commitment while family problems and personality clashes are affecting female's organisational commitment in contrasting economies. The consequences of stress are similar for both types of employees however, males showed cognitive symptoms while females are more effectively using personal resources to over their stress and exhibit behavioural symptoms. Females have higher affective and normative commitment while males demonstrate normative commitment. Pakistan workforce demonstrated high level of stress than UK workforce.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:bau:ijabms:v:1:y:2016:i:1:id:258
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://journal.bauderpress.org.tr/index.php/ijabms/article/view/258
File Function: Abstract page
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://journal.bauderpress.org.tr/index.php/ijabms/article/download/258/187
File Function: Full text
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Keywords

;
;
;
;
;

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bau:ijabms:v:1:y:2016:i:1:id:258. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: BAUDER Press editorial office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journal.bauderpress.org.tr/index.php/ijabms .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.