IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bas/econst/y2026i6p180-197.html

Brand Credibility as a Determinant of Consumer Price Sensitivity in Food Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Shqiprim Jashari
  • Nexhat Shkodra
  • Artan Haziri

Abstract

Consumers often rely on credible brands when evaluating product quality and deciding whether a price increase is acceptable. Credibility acts as a signal that indicates that a brand is consistently true to its word, therefore reducing information asymmetry and providing consumers with a measurable value of product quality. This signalling mechanism reduces consumer price sensitivity by decreasing the perceived risk of purchasing a product and subsequently increasing the level of consumer confidence in the product's performance. Given that the food category is typically the highest risk-sensitive category of frequently purchased products, this research aims to examine how brand credibility influences consumer reactions to price changes using Information Economic Theory, Signalling Theory, and current consumer behaviour research. The findings of this research highlight that consumers feel less concerned about changes in price when they are purchasing products from recognised, reputable brands due to the level of trust associated with the brand. Additionally, frequent or unexpected changes in price that are experienced by consumers purchasing food items result in an increased level of perceived risk regarding the value that they place on the products purchased. This study demonstrates that perceived brand trust can significantly influence how much cognitive effort consumers will use to make purchasing decisions, particularly in markets where they are unable to directly assess the quality, safety and freshness of an item prior to consumption. In conclusion, this study has important contributions for theory and practice. From the perspective of theory, this study supports and confirms that signalling mechanisms are significant in markets where uncertainty exists and provides an empirical basis for the moderating effect of brand trust within the food market. In terms of practice, the results from this study illustrate the importance of manufacturers investing in clear communication of price, improved quality assurance processes, and developing brand strategies that build trust over the long-term in order to reduce perceived risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Shqiprim Jashari & Nexhat Shkodra & Artan Haziri, 2026. "Brand Credibility as a Determinant of Consumer Price Sensitivity in Food Markets," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 6, pages 180-197.
  • Handle: RePEc:bas:econst:y:2026:i:6:p:180-197
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://archive.econ-studies.iki.bas.bg/2026/2026_06/2026_06_09.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Kwasi Oppong & Nicholas Oppong Mensah & Daniel Berko, 2025. "Word-Of-Mouth and Willingness to Pay (WTP) Price Premium: Mediating Role of Herbal Brand Credibility and Brand Trust in Ghana," Journal of African Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 47-64, January.
    2. Erdmann, Anett & Mas, José Manuel & de Obesso, Mercedes, 2023. "Disruptive technologies: How to influence price sensitivity triggering consumers’ behavioural beliefs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    3. Nelson, Philip, 1974. "Advertising as Information," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 82(4), pages 729-754, July/Aug..
    4. Francioni, Barbara & De Cicco, Roberta & Curina, Ilaria & Cioppi, Marco, 2025. "The strength of stance: The impact of brand activism on resistance to negative information, purchasing, and premium paying intents across different types of failures," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    5. Molinillo, Sebastian & Japutra, Arnold & Ekinci, Yuksel, 2022. "Building brand credibility: The role of involvement, identification, reputation and attachment," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kyle Bagwell & Garey Ramey, 1988. "Advertising and Limit Pricing," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 19(1), pages 59-71, Spring.
    2. Del Barrio-García, Salvador & Kamakura, Wagner A. & Luque-Martínez, Teodoro, 2019. "A Longitudinal Cross-product Analysis of Media-budget Allocations: How Economic and Technological Disruptions Affected Media Choices Across Industries," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 1-15.
    3. Thunström, Linda & Nordström, Jonas & Shogren, Jason F., 2015. "Certainty and overconfidence in future preferences for food," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 101-113.
    4. J. K. Pappalardo, 2022. "Economics of Consumer Protection: Contributions and Challenges in Estimating Consumer Injury and Evaluating Consumer Protection Policy," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 45(2), pages 201-238, June.
    5. repec:ebl:ecbull:v:10:y:2004:i:8:p:1-8 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Dhaval M. Dave, 2013. "Effects of Pharmaceutical Promotion: A Review and Assessment," NBER Working Papers 18830, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Eunae Jung & Hyungun Sung, 2017. "The Influence of the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Outbreak on Online and Offline Markets for Retail Sales," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-23, March.
    8. Fabio FIORILLO & Marco LILLA & Stefano STAFFOLANI, 2013. "Advertising Has Got You On The Run. Well-Being, Consumption and Leisure in a GE model," Working Papers 389, Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali.
    9. Hattori, Keisuke & Higashida, Keisaku, 2014. "Misleading advertising and minimum quality standards," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 1-14.
    10. Michelle Haynes & Steve Thompson, 2012. "The Economic Significance of User-Generated Feedback," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 153-166, February.
    11. Suwelack, Thomas & Hogreve, Jens & Hoyer, Wayne D., 2011. "Understanding Money-Back Guarantees: Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Outcomes," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 87(4), pages 462-478.
    12. Chadwick J. Miller & Daniel C. Brannon & Jim Salas & Martha Troncoza, 2021. "Advertising, incentives, and the upsell: how advertising differentially moderates customer- vs. retailer-directed price incentives’ impact on consumers’ preferences for premium products," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(6), pages 1043-1064, November.
    13. Aslan, Hadiye & Kumar, Praveen, 2016. "The product market effects of hedge fund activism," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(1), pages 226-248.
    14. Ascensión Andina‐Díaz & Javier Campos & Juan‐Luis Jiménez & Jordi Perdiguero, 2024. "Strategic advertising in the aftermath of a corporate scandal," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 92(6), pages 663-699, December.
    15. Pracejus, John W. & O'Guinn, Thomas C. & Olsen, G. Douglas, 2013. "When white space is more than “burning money”: Economic signaling meets visual commercial rhetoric," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 211-218.
    16. Xujin Pu & Huanzhen Zhang, 2016. "Voluntary Certification of Agricultural Products in Competitive Markets: The Consideration of Boundedly Rational Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-13, September.
    17. Ignatius J. Horstmann & Glenn M. MacDonald, 1994. "When Is Advertising a Signal of Product Quality?," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 3(3), pages 561-584, September.
    18. Marco Costanigro & Yuko Onozaka, 2020. "A Belief‐Preference Model of Choice for Experience and Credence Goods," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(1), pages 70-95, February.
    19. Jeen-Su Lim & Abdulrahman Al-Aali & John Heinrichs, 2015. "Erratum to: Impact of satisfaction with e-retailers’ touch points on purchase behavior: the moderating effect of search and experience product type," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 727-727, December.
    20. Richards, Timothy J. & Patterson, Paul M., 2000. "New Varieties And The Returns To Commodity Promotion: The Case Of Fuji Apples," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 29(01), pages 1-14, April.
    21. Dominiak, Adam & Lee, Dongwoo, 2023. "Testing rational hypotheses in signaling games," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing
    • D12 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • D18 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Protection
    • L66 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing - - - Food; Beverages; Cosmetics; Tobacco

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bas:econst:y:2026:i:6:p:180-197. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Diana Dimitrova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ikbasbg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.