Author
Listed:
- Bozhidar Nedev
- Ivanka Mihaylova
Abstract
Employees’ interactions in organisations are always marked by conflicts and may significantly affect employees’ and the organisation’s performance. Behavioural biases are considered as both sources of conflicts and obstacles to conflict resolution. Despite this, there is a research gap regarding the role of behavioural biases in conflict resolution, particularly in integrating conflict management theory with the behavioural biases’ perspective. The paper aims to investigate prevailing behavioural biases of employees in the Bulgarian service sector, the level of conflict resolution and the intercept between both. Using a Google Forms questionnaire, data were collected from 372 employees on their perceived conflict resolution effectiveness and their propensity to 17 behavioural biases. The statistical analysis used includes descriptive statistics, Cronbach’s Alpha reliability test, exploratory factor analysis, one-sample t-test, Cohen’s d coefficient, and Spearman’s Rho correlation analysis. Results indicate that employees consider their workplace conflicts well-managed. The behavioural biases displayed are conservatism, confirmation, overconfidence bias, halo effect, representativeness, herding, self-attribution, optimism and wishful thinking, illusion of control, regret aversion bias (errors of commission), and horn effect. Multiple positive correlations are observed between different biases. The highest positive correlation is identified between conservatism and confirmation bias, while a negative correlation is found only between conservatism and out-group bias, and representativeness and implicit bias. The level of conflict resolution is positively correlated with conservatism, confirmation bias, halo, herding effect, optimism and wishful thinking, overconfidence, representativeness, illusion of control and self-attribution bias. The study provides insights for managers in developing effective interpersonal conflict management strategies that consider behavioural factors.
Suggested Citation
Bozhidar Nedev & Ivanka Mihaylova, 2026.
"An Empirical Study of Behavioral Biases in Conflict Resolution in the Bulgarian Service Sector,"
Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 2, pages 132-156.
Handle:
RePEc:bas:econst:y:2026:i:2:p:132-156
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
JEL classification:
- D23 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Organizational Behavior; Transaction Costs; Property Rights
- D74 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Conflict; Conflict Resolution; Alliances; Revolutions
- G41 - Financial Economics - - Behavioral Finance - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making in Financial Markets
- M12 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Personnel Management; Executives; Executive Compensation
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bas:econst:y:2026:i:2:p:132-156. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Diana Dimitrova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ikbasbg.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.