IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/baq/taprar/v2y2021i13p24-29.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison review between monofacial and bifacial solar modules

Author

Listed:
  • Ghayda’ A. Matarneh

    (Al-Hussein Bin Talal University)

  • Mohammad A. Al-Rawajfeh

    (Al-Hussein Bin Talal University)

  • Mohamed R. Gomaa

    (Al-Hussein Bin Talal University)

Abstract

The objects of the study are solar modules. The world has witnessed a change in all aspects of life, especially in the last period, when the world witnessed an increase in the demand for energy and all regions. Here the imperfection appeared in meeting the energy needs, just as the traditional sources (oil, coal, and natural gas), for example, are no longer hope as they are non-renewable sources. In addition to these sources, to exploit the energy in them, we must burn, which pollutes the environment, in addition to the cost of transportation. Not long ago, solar energy began to produce electricity through photovoltaic modules, and competition began to make photovoltaic modules with higher efficiency. The main aim of this study is to clarify the concept of bifacial photovoltaic modules and show some differences between them and monofacial photovoltaic modules. The current report consists of the definition of bifacial photovoltaic modules and their most important specifications, comparing them with monofacial photovoltaic modules, which are the best, the factors affecting their energy production, and the type of radiation used in each type. In fact, the utilization of albedo radiation for monofacial photovoltaic modules does not exceed 2 %, while this percentage is exceeded in bifacial photovoltaic modules. So, it can be recommended here that the trend to use bifacial photovoltaic modules can be economical and space-saving space because it produces more amount of electricity for the same unit area, which in turn this spaces it available for other applications, and also, increase the amount of electricity due to the increase in the effective side size (two sides: one upwards and the other is downward) of the solar modules.

Suggested Citation

  • Ghayda’ A. Matarneh & Mohammad A. Al-Rawajfeh & Mohamed R. Gomaa, 2022. "Comparison review between monofacial and bifacial solar modules," Technology audit and production reserves, PC TECHNOLOGY CENTER, vol. 6(1(68)), pages 24-29, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:baq:taprar:v:2:y:2021:i:13:p:24-29
    DOI: 10.15587/2706-5448.2022.268955
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.uran.ua/tarp/article/view/268955/264909
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15587/2706-5448.2022.268955?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:baq:taprar:v:2:y:2021:i:13:p:24-29. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iryna Prudius (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.uran.ua/tarp/issue/archive .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.