IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aza/jsoc00/y2017v9i3p269-292.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The case for a ‘sovereign’ distributed securities depository for securities settlement

Author

Listed:
  • Everett, Steve
  • Calitz, André
  • Greyling, Jean

Abstract

Since the release of Satoshi Nakamoto’s breakthrough white paper in 2008, which preceded disruptive peer to peer value transmission through the Bitcoin network instead of by traditional means, many applications have been sought in financial services generally and more narrowly within capital markets for the Blockchain technology that underpins the Bitcoin network. To date, no capital markets infrastructure globally has implemented a commercially viable Blockchain or distributed ledger technology (DLT) solution. Blockchain technology is also experiencing a period of inflated expectations on a global scale from being a solution to curbing online piracy to replacing rational databases. Within the ambit of capital markets, the most ‘obvious’ of all the use cases, is in post-trade securities settlement. There are various use-case specific prototypes at custodians, investment banks, stock exchanges and central securities depositories (CSDs) alike. The utopic use-case being the ability for a buyer (investor) to transact directly with a seller on a ‘peer to peer’ basis and to have settlement occur in near-immediate time with a low transaction cost and records of the transaction immediately available to the issuer of the stock, even on a crossborder basis. Although public blockchains such as the Bitcoin Blockchain and Ethereum provide the closest match to this elementary example, both have limitations and have experienced cyber security attacks, which have cast doubt over their ability to house or operate notoriously risk-averse capital markets infrastructures. Most of these infrastructures, although largely aligned to international best practices, are designed specifically to suit country or regional specific operations and regulations. This paper will review the approaches, solutions and cryptographic techniques taken to settle securities on a DLT platform to date and why none of these approaches have as yet resulted in commercial use either by an unknown business outside of the capital markets in a disruptive manner or by the incumbents. The approaches and the technology aspects will be combined to develop a conceptual DLT ecosystem for securities settlement. This will be based on available literature that could realistically be applied to a capital markets infrastructure and deliver some of the promises of DLT, which will potentially enhance securities settlement for the purposes of commercial use.

Suggested Citation

  • Everett, Steve & Calitz, André & Greyling, Jean, 2017. "The case for a ‘sovereign’ distributed securities depository for securities settlement," Journal of Securities Operations & Custody, Henry Stewart Publications, vol. 9(3), pages 269-292, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:aza:jsoc00:y:2017:v:9:i:3:p:269-292
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hstalks.com/article/3553/download/
    Download Restriction: Requires a paid subscription for full access.

    File URL: https://hstalks.com/article/3553/
    Download Restriction: Requires a paid subscription for full access.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Blockchain; distributed ledger technology (DLT); capital markets; central securities depositories (CSD); cryptography;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G2 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services
    • E5 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit
    • K22 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Business and Securities Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aza:jsoc00:y:2017:v:9:i:3:p:269-292. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Henry Stewart Talks (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.