IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aza/jsoc00/y2016v8i1p41-45.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Collateral management — Winners or losers in five years’ time?

Author

Listed:
  • Ruault, Philippe

    (Head of Digital Transformation, BNP Paribas Securities Services, France)

Abstract

During the last network management forum in Athens (NEMA Europe 2015), a number of collateral topics were addressed during a panel that involved key players in the field ranging from central securities depositories (CSDs) to exchanges and custodians. This paper looks ahead at the collateral management world and asks what trends will define the next five years and which players will come out on top. It defines the current state of the collateral management market, analysing the major factors causing disruption and discussing the key players, before outlining the near-future impact of the tri-party collateral management model. The tri-party model is predicted to grow in strength with further cooper­ation between infrastructures and providers. The paper then looks at how the various players and models should define success. It is important that collateral is liberated from silos and maintains high ‘velocity’ while meeting regulatory requirements, as well as being flexible enough to meet various client needs and operating models, as well as making good time to market. Custodians have had to adapt and develop offers to cope with the new market demand. They will have to embrace the tri-party model and cope with disruptive technologies such as distributed ledger systems in order to come out on top.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruault, Philippe, 2016. "Collateral management — Winners or losers in five years’ time?," Journal of Securities Operations & Custody, Henry Stewart Publications, vol. 8(1), pages 41-45, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:aza:jsoc00:y:2016:v:8:i:1:p:41-45
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hstalks.com/article/4880/download/
    Download Restriction: Requires a paid subscription for full access.

    File URL: https://hstalks.com/article/4880/
    Download Restriction: Requires a paid subscription for full access.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    collateral; tri-party; CSD; HQLA; T2S; EMIR; blockchain;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G2 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services
    • E5 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit
    • K22 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Business and Securities Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aza:jsoc00:y:2016:v:8:i:1:p:41-45. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Henry Stewart Talks (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.