IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/asr/journl/v13y2023i3p346-362.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Problems of legal regulation of artificial intelligence in administrative judicial procedure

Author

Listed:
  • Oleksandr SHEVCHUK

    (Department of Administrative Law and Administratively Activities, Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, Kharkiv, Ukraine.)

  • Volodymyr MARTYNOVSKYI

    (Department of Administrative Law and Administratively Activities,Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, Kharkiv, Ukraine.)

  • Olena VOLIANSKA

    (Department of Sociology and Political Science, Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, Kharkiv, Ukraine.)

  • Ihor KOMPANIIETS

    (Department of Administrative Law and Administratively Activities, Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, Kharkiv, Ukraine.)

  • Oleg BULULUKOV

    (Department of Criminalistics, Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, Kharkiv, Ukraine.)

Abstract

The use of digital technologies in administrative courts uses the legal systems of the European Union and the world to strengthen the ways of protecting human rights. This paper examines certain problems of legal regulation of the use of artificial intelligence technologies in administrative judicial procеdure. The methodology of this work is based on an interdisciplinary approach using comparative legal, dialectical and systemic methods. The main objective of this article is to determine the forms and directions, risks and benefits, prospects for the use of artificial intelligence in administrative judicial procеdure, taking into account foreign experience in legal regulation in this area. The concept of "artificial intelligence" is investigated. It is emphasized that the use of artificial intelligence technologies in administrative judicial procеdure is an acceptable use only of specialized intelligent systems that can work under human control. It is stated that when considering administrative cases in an administrative court of minor complexity, it is possible to use artificial intelligence technologies, which will be able to independently generalize and analyze legislation, judicial practice and be a recommendation for a judge when making a fair and lawful decision on the principles of the rule of law. It has been established that the use of artificial intelligence technologies in administrative proceedings provides opportunities for the effective implementation of the right to judicial protection, but can be used to take actions that are contrary to the rule of law, in particular regarding the violation of the right to a fair trial in administrative cases in administrative courts. The latter requires the improvement of legal regulation of the use of artificial intelligence technologies in administrative judicial procеdure using international principles and standards.

Suggested Citation

  • Oleksandr SHEVCHUK & Volodymyr MARTYNOVSKYI & Olena VOLIANSKA & Ihor KOMPANIIETS & Oleg BULULUKOV, 2023. "Problems of legal regulation of artificial intelligence in administrative judicial procedure," Juridical Tribune - Review of Comparative and International Law, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, vol. 13(3), pages 346-362, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:asr:journl:v:13:y:2023:i:3:p:346-362
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://tribunajuridica.eu/arhiva/An13v3/2.%20Shevchuk%20and%20others.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    right to judicial protection; artificial intelligence; digital technology; electronic technology; administrative judicial procеdure; legal regulation.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K23 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Regulated Industries and Administrative Law
    • K24 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Cyber Law
    • K41 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior - - - Litigation Process

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:asr:journl:v:13:y:2023:i:3:p:346-362. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin-Silviu Sararu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.