IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/arv/journl/v3y2025i1p32-52.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Explaining Economic and Environmental Outcomes Through Renewable Energy Quality: An Interpretable Machine Learning Approach Using XGBoost and SHAP

Author

Listed:
  • Eyyüp Ensari Åžahin

Abstract

This study analyzes the effects of renewable energy systems on macroeconomic and environmental results for seven countries from 2000-2023. Three new indices were formed to show not only the quantitative but the structural and qualitative parts of renewable energy systems: the Green Energy Growth Rate, Energy Diversity Index, and Risk Adjusted Green Score. These respectively show the growth rate of production, the sources of energy diversity, and the volatility-adjusted stability of renewable energy production. Renewable Energy Indicators of Economic Growth: A Novel Explainable Framework. We try to answer whether or not a green energy index accelerates economic development while trying to answer the question of whether or not the green score diminishes environmental pollution. Using the machine learning-based XGBoost regression model and SHapley Additive exPlanations methodology- powerful tools that offer relatively new approaches to the twin problems of renewable energy indicators toward economic growth, and environmental pollution- the paper quantifies both numerically and casually the contributions of renewable energy indicators to economic growth, FDI, gross savings, public finances, and particulate matter-related environmental damage. Country-specific response profiles to these energy indicators were grouped through K-Means clustering analysis. At a more intuitive level of understanding results, one notes that the Risk Adjusted Green Score (RAGS) has the greatest power in terms of influencing the reduction of environmental damage. Closest to the classical theoretical relation with the dependent variable is found to be the Green Energy Growth Rate (GEGR). The Energy Diversity Index (EDI) proves support and support-based balance, particularly within public finance indicators. Countries are clustered into three structural groups based on the 18-dimensional SHAP response profiles. This can offer much intuition into the heterogeneity of energy policy impacts and sustainability outcomes. The study has revealed the inadequacy of policies towards renewable energies, which are directed merely to the expansion of capacity in the context of the goals of sustainable development. It argues for the development of a policy design framework that incites dimensions of diversity and stability in a holistic manner that could more adequately undertake the requirements of both economic development and the protection of the environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Eyyüp Ensari Åžahin, 2025. "Explaining Economic and Environmental Outcomes Through Renewable Energy Quality: An Interpretable Machine Learning Approach Using XGBoost and SHAP," Journal of Sustainable Development Issues (JOSDI), SDIjournals, vol. 3(1), pages 32-52, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:arv:journl:v:3:y:2025:i:1:p:32-52
    DOI: 10.62433/josdi.v3i1.46
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journalsdi.com/index.php/jsdi/article/view/46/25
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journalsdi.com/index.php/jsdi/article/view/46
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.62433/josdi.v3i1.46?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li Zhe & Serhat Yüksel & Hasan Dinçer & Shahriyar Mukhtarov & Mayis Azizov, 2021. "The Positive Influences of Renewable Energy Consumption on Financial Development and Economic Growth," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sarsar, Lamiae & Echaoui, Abdellah, 2024. "Empirical analysis of the economic complexity boost on the impact of energy transition on economic growth: A panel data study of 124 countries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    2. Mukhtarov, Shahriyar & Yüksel, Serhat & Dinçer, Hasan, 2022. "The impact of financial development on renewable energy consumption: Evidence from Turkey," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 169-176.
    3. Houcine Benlaria & Naeimah Fahad S. Almawishir, 2024. "The Relationship between Electricity Consumption, Price of Oils, and Gross Domestic Product in the Gulf Cooperation Council Countries," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(1), pages 66-75, January.
    4. Zongyue He & Yanhong Zhang & Xiqian Wang, 2024. "Has the Development of Broadband Infrastructure Improved Household Energy Consumption in Rural China?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-20, October.
    5. Heru Wahyudi & Ukhti Ciptawaty & Arivina Ratih & Ahmad Dhea Pratama, 2023. "Comparison of Renewable and Non-Renewable Energy in the Long and Short Term of Indonesia Economy," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(5), pages 194-201, September.
    6. Reitumetse Ngcobo & Milan Christian De Wet, 2024. "The Impact of Financial Development and Economic Growth on Renewable Energy Supply in South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-24, March.
    7. Engy Raouf, 2022. "Public Debt Energy Consumption Nexus," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 12(5), pages 146-151, September.
    8. Xu, Siyun & Zhang, Xuebin & Lee, Kyung-Jae, 2024. "Channelizing the importance of natural resources and renewable energy for financial development: Resources curse perspective for high growth countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    9. Hasara Dissanayake & Nishitha Perera & Sajani Abeykoon & Diruni Samson & Ruwan Jayathilaka & Maneka Jayasinghe & Shanta Yapa, 2023. "Nexus between carbon emissions, energy consumption, and economic growth: Evidence from global economies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(6), pages 1-27, June.
    10. Luky Patricia Widianingsih & Cliff Kohardinata & Emelie Vlaviorine, 2024. "Renewable Energy Consumption, ESG Reporting, and Fixed Asset Turnover: Does it Work in Asia?," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(1), pages 552-558, January.
    11. Blanka Tundys & Agnieszka Bretyn, 2024. "Inclusive Growth, Energy Poverty and Digital and Social Development: Cross-Country Analysis of the European Union," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-21, September.
    12. Yiqing Zhao & Renata Korsakienė & Hasan Dinçer & Serhat Yüksel, 2022. "Identifying Significant Points of Energy Culture for Developing Sustainable Energy Investments," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, March.
    13. Khairul Aswadi & Abd. Jamal & Sofyan Syahnur & Muhammad Nasir, 2023. "Renewable and Non-renewable Energy Consumption in Indonesia: Does it Matter for Economic Growth?," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(2), pages 107-116, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Q42 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Alternative Energy Sources
    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth
    • C55 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Large Data Sets: Modeling and Analysis
    • O44 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - Environment and Growth
    • F21 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business - - - International Investment; Long-Term Capital Movements

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arv:journl:v:3:y:2025:i:1:p:32-52. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Shahriyar Mukhtarov (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.