IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/apn/agregt/v9y2025i2p184-196id22380.html

How Do Audit Capacity Stress Affect Audit Quality? The Mediating Mechanism of Due Professional Care

Author

Listed:
  • Abdul Hamid

  • Farhanah Murniasih

Abstract

This study aims to investigate whether due professional care mediates the relationship between audit capacity stress and audit quality. A quantitative approach was applied using survey data collected from 105 auditors working in Jakarta, Indonesia. Hypotheses were tested using the Hayes’ PROCESS Macro (Model 4) to test direct and indirect effects. The results indicate that audit capacity stress positively influences due professional care, suggesting a compensatory discipline effect whereby increased pressure stimulates greater auditor vigilance. Due professional care, in turn, has a significant positive effect on audit quality. Mediation analysis further reveals that due professional care partially mediates the relationship between audit capacity stress and audit quality, implying that heightened diligence can mitigate some adverse effects of stress, although excessive workload may still impair quality through other behavioral mechanisms such as fatigue or distraction. Theoretically, this study contributes to behavioral auditing literature by identifying due professional care as a key cognitive pathway linking stress and quality. Practically, the findings highlight the importance for audit firms to balance workload demands with effective supervision to sustain audit quality, particularly during peak audit periods.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdul Hamid & Farhanah Murniasih, 2025. "How Do Audit Capacity Stress Affect Audit Quality? The Mediating Mechanism of Due Professional Care," Agregat: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. DR HAMKA., vol. 9(2), pages 184-196.
  • Handle: RePEc:apn:agregt:v:9:y:2025:i:2:p:184-196:id:22380
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journal.uhamka.ac.id/index.php/agregat/article/view/22380
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jun Chen & Wang Dong & Hongling Han & Nan Zhou, 2020. "Does Audit Partner Workload Compression Affect Audit Quality?," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(5), pages 1021-1053, October.
    2. Smith, Kenneth J. & Emerson, David J., 2017. "An analysis of the relation between resilience and reduced audit quality within the role stress paradigm," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 1-14.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chantal Mangion & Norbert Tabone & Peter J. Baldacchino & Simon Grima, 2021. "Audit Quality and Resilience beyond the Role Stress Model: A Maltese Perspective," International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, vol. 11(3), pages 37-56.
    2. Hou, Fei & Shen, Huayu & Wang, Ping & Xiong, Hao, 2023. "Signing auditors' cultural background and debt financing costs," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    3. Guillermina Tormo-Carbó & Zeena Mardawi & Elies Seguí-Mas, 2024. "Should I Stay or Should I Go? Auditor Ethical Conflict and Turnover Intention," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 194(2), pages 335-350, October.
    4. Mohannad Obeid Al Shbail, 2018. "A Theoretical Discussion of Factors Affecting the Internal Audit Quality in Jordanian Public Shareholding Companies," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 8(2), pages 218-227, April.
    5. Mihai Carp & Costel Istrate, 2021. "Audit Quality under Influences of Audit Firm and Auditee Characteristics: Evidence from the Romanian Regulated Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-16, June.
    6. Mohannad Obeid Al Shbail, 2018. "The Effect of Role Ambiguity and Role Conflict on Dysfunctional Audit Behaviour: Evidence from Jordan," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 8(3), pages 17-25, July.
    7. David J. Emerson & Joseph F. Hair & Kenneth J. Smith, 2023. "Psychological Distress, Burnout, and Business Student Turnover: The Role of Resilience as a Coping Mechanism," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 64(2), pages 228-259, March.
    8. Dong, Bei & Nash, Jonathan & Xu, Le, 2022. "Indirect effects of regulatory change: Evidence from the acceleration of the 10-K filing deadline," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    9. Al Shbail, Mohannad & Salleh, Zalailah & Mohd Nor, M. N., 2018. "Antecedents of burnout and its relationship to internal audit quality," Business and Economic Horizons (BEH), Prague Development Center, vol. 14(4), pages 789-817, August.
    10. Felix, Robert & Wilford, Amanda L., 2024. "Auditor's financial stress: An inconspicuous determinant of audit outcomes," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    11. Smith, Kenneth J. & Emerson, David J. & Haight, Timothy D. & Mauldin, Shawn & Wood, Bob G., 2019. "An examination of the psychometric properties of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale-10 (CD-RISC10) among accounting and business students," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 48-62.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:apn:agregt:v:9:y:2025:i:2:p:184-196:id:22380. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Susilo (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journal.uhamka.ac.id/index.php/agregat/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.