IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/1999894517-523_8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consanguinity and recurrence risk of stillbirth and infant death

Author

Listed:
  • Stoltenberg, C.
  • Magnus, P.
  • Skrondal, A.
  • Lie, R.T.

Abstract

Objectives. The aim of this study was to estimate the recurrence risk for stillbirth and infant death and compare results for offspring of first- cousin parents with results for offspring of unrelated parents. Methods. The study population consisted of all single births with a previous sibling born in Norway between 1967 and 1994. Altogether, 629 888 births were to unrelated parents, and 3466 births were to parents who were first cousins. The risk of stillbirth and infant death was estimated for subsequent siblings contingent on parental consanguinity and survival of the previous sibling. Results. For unrelated parents, the risk of early death (stillbirth plus infant death) for the subsequent sibling was 17 of 1000 if the previous child survived and 67 of 1000 if the previous child died before 1 year of age. For parents who were first cousins, the risk of early death for the subsequent sibling was 29 of 1000 if the previous child survived and 116 of 1000 if the previous child died. Conclusions. The risk recurrence of stillbirth and infant death is higher for offspring of first-cousin parents compared with offspring of unrelated parents.

Suggested Citation

  • Stoltenberg, C. & Magnus, P. & Skrondal, A. & Lie, R.T., 1999. "Consanguinity and recurrence risk of stillbirth and infant death," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 89(4), pages 517-523.
    • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1999:89:4:517-523_8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Akyol, Pelin & Mocan, Naci, 2020. "Education and Consanguineous Marriage," IZA Discussion Papers 13985, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1999:89:4:517-523_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.