IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/19988881233-1236_7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

1996 congressional campaign priorities of the AMA: Tackling tobacco or limiting malpractice awards?

Author

Listed:
  • Sharfstein, J.

Abstract

Objectives. This study sought to determine whether the political action committee of the American Medical Association (AMA) contributed more to pro- or anti-tobacco members of Congress in the 1995/96 campaign and whether representatives' voting records on malpractice reform could explain the AMA's contribution patterns. Methods. Campaign contributions to House members were analyzed. Results. The AMA's political action committee contributed averages of $5382 to pro-tobacco representatives and $2103 to anti-tobacco representatives (P

Suggested Citation

  • Sharfstein, J., 1998. "1996 congressional campaign priorities of the AMA: Tackling tobacco or limiting malpractice awards?," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 88(8), pages 1233-1236.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1998:88:8:1233-1236_7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rabinowitz, Aaron & Laugesen, Miriam, 2010. "Niche players in health policy: Medical specialty societies in Congress 1969-2002," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(7), pages 1341-1348, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1998:88:8:1233-1236_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.