IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.2013.301343_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ethical issues in conducting research with deaf populations

Author

Listed:
  • McKee, M.
  • Schlehofer, D.
  • Thew, D.

Abstract

Deaf American Sign Language (ASL) users represent a small population at risk for marginalization from research and surveillance activities resulting from cultural, language, and ethical challenges. The Deaf community's view of deafness as a cultural identity, rather than a disability, contradicts the medical community's perception of deafness as a disease or deficiency in need of correction or elimination. These differences continue to have significant cultural and social implications within the Deaf community, resulting in mistrust of research opportunities. Two particularly contentious ethical topics for the Deaf community are the absence of community representation in genetic research and the lack of accessible informed consents and research materials. This article outlines a series of innovative strategies and solutions to these issues, including the importance of community representation and collaboration with researchers studying deaf populations.

Suggested Citation

  • McKee, M. & Schlehofer, D. & Thew, D., 2013. "Ethical issues in conducting research with deaf populations," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 103(12), pages 2174-2178.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2013.301343_6
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301343
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301343
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301343?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tyler G. James & Julia R. Varnes & Meagan K. Sullivan & JeeWon Cheong & Thomas A. Pearson & Ali M. Yurasek & M. David Miller & Michael M. McKee, 2021. "Conceptual Model of Emergency Department Utilization among Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Patients: A Critical Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-26, December.
    2. Caroline Jagoe & Caitlin McDonald & Minerva Rivas & Nora Groce, 2021. "Direct participation of people with communication disabilities in research on poverty and disabilities in low and middle income countries: A critical review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(10), pages 1-24, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2013.301343_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.