IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.2007.131466_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Best-practice physical activity programs for older adults: Findings from the National Impact Study

Author

Listed:
  • Hughes, S.L.
  • Seymour, R.B.
  • Campbell, R.T.
  • Whitelaw, N.
  • Bazzarre, T.

Abstract

Objectives. We assessed the impact of existing best-practice physical activity programs for older adults on physical activity participation and health-related outcomes. Methods. We used a multisite, randomized trial with 544 older adults (mean age 66 years) and measures at baseline, 5, and 10 months to test the impact of a multiple-component physical activity program compared with results for a control group that did not participate in such a program. Results. For adults who participated in a multiple-component physical activity program, we found statistically significant benefits at 5 and 10 months with regard to self-efficacy for exercise adherence over time (P

Suggested Citation

  • Hughes, S.L. & Seymour, R.B. & Campbell, R.T. & Whitelaw, N. & Bazzarre, T., 2009. "Best-practice physical activity programs for older adults: Findings from the National Impact Study," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 99(2), pages 362-368.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2007.131466_6
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.131466
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2007.131466
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.2007.131466?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michael Lechner & Paul Downward, 2017. "Heterogeneous sports participation and labour market outcomes in England," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(4), pages 335-348, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2007.131466_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.