IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aoq/ekonom/y2025i2p278-293.html

Idea rozwoju gospodarczego a metafora niewidzialnej ręki. Uwagi dotyczące interpretacji dziedzictwa Adama Smitha w trzechsetną rocznicę urodzin

Author

Listed:
  • Wojciech Giza
  • Dariusz Grzybek

Abstract

W artykule zastosowano podejście swoiste dla historii myśli ekonomicznej po to, aby przedstawić ideę rozwoju gospodarczego w kontekście mechanizmu niewidzialnej ręki. Struktura opracowania składa się z trzech części. W pierwszej przedstawiono uzasadnienie celowości zastosowania metody analizy historycznej do badanego problemu. Następnie omówiono zagadnienie rozwoju gospodarczego w interpretacji A. Smitha. Trzecia część zawiera opis badań, pokazujących sposób interpretacji rynku przez następców Smitha, a także próbę wyjaśnienia, dlaczego idee zakorzenione w klasycznej ekonomii politycznej nadal uznaje się za ważne dziedzictwo współczesnej ekonomii.

Suggested Citation

  • Wojciech Giza & Dariusz Grzybek, 2025. "Idea rozwoju gospodarczego a metafora niewidzialnej ręki. Uwagi dotyczące interpretacji dziedzictwa Adama Smitha w trzechsetną rocznicę urodzin," Ekonomista, Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne, issue 2, pages 278-293.
    • Handle: RePEc:aoq:ekonom:y:2025:i:2:p:278-293
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ekonomista.pte.pl/pdf-196699-119592
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rothschild, Emma, 1994. "Adam Smith and the Invisible Hand," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 84(2), pages 319-322, May.
    2. Lester B. Lave, 1962. "An Empirical Approach to the Prisoners' Dilemma Game," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 76(3), pages 424-436.
    3. Bjerkholt, Olav, 2017. "On The Founding Of The Econometric Society," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 39(2), pages 175-198, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Callum Williams, 2015. "Famine: Adam Smith and Foucauldian Political Economy," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 62(2), pages 171-190, May.
    2. Fabian Dvorak & Regina Stumpf & Sebastian Fehrler & Urs Fischbacher, 2024. "Generative AI Triggers Welfare-Reducing Decisions in Humans," Papers 2401.12773, arXiv.org.
    3. Michela Chessa & Nobuyuki Hanaki & Aymeric Lardon & Takashi Yamada, 2023. "An Experimental Nash Program: A Comparison of Structured v.s. Semi-Structured Bargaining Experiments," ISER Discussion Paper 1221r, Institute of Social and Economic Research, The University of Osaka, revised Sep 2024.
    4. Adrian Pabst & Roberto Scazzieri, 2012. "The political economy of civil society," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 337-356, December.
    5. Schilirò, Daniele & Young, Warren, 2021. "The Econometric Society European meetings 1931-1939: Influences on economics," MPRA Paper 109270, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Bruce E. Kaufman, 2016. "Adam Smith’s Economics and the Modern Minimum Wage Debate:The Large Distance Separating Kirkcaldy from Chicago," Journal of Labor Research, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 29-52, March.
    7. Nicolas Vallois & Dorian Jullien, 2017. "Estimating Rationality in Economics: A History of Statistical Methods in Experimental Economics," Working Papers halshs-01651070, HAL.
    8. repec:jpe:journl:2029 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Pedro Garcia Duarte & Yann Giraud, 2014. "Chasing the B: A Bibliographic Account of Economics’ Relation to its Past, 1991-2011," Working Papers, Department of Economics 2014_06, University of São Paulo (FEA-USP).
    10. Fernandes, Leonardo H.S. & Silva, José W.L. & de Araujo, Fernando H.A., 2022. "Multifractal risk measures by Macroeconophysics perspective: The case of Brazilian inflation dynamics," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    11. Norman Frohlich & Joe Oppenheimer & Pat Bond & Irvin Boschman, 1984. "Beyond Economic Man," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 28(1), pages 3-24, March.
    12. Sriya Iyer, 2016. "The New Economics of Religion," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 54(2), pages 395-441, June.
    13. Matthias P. Hühn & Claus Dierksmeier, 2016. "Will the Real A. Smith Please Stand Up!," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 136(1), pages 119-132, June.
    14. Antoine Billot, 2009. "How to shake the invisible hand (when Robinson meets Friday)," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 5(3), pages 257-270, September.
    15. Horn, Karen, 2019. "The difficult relationship between historical ordoliberalism and Adam Smith," Freiburg Discussion Papers on Constitutional Economics 19/3, Walter Eucken Institut e.V..
    16. Antoni Bosch-Domenech & Shyam Sunder, 2000. "Tracking the Invisible Hand: Convergence of Double Auctions to Competitive Equilibrium," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 16(3), pages 257-284, December.
    17. Yongseok Shin, 2025. "Branko Milanovic: visions of inequality: from the French Revolution to the end of the Cold War," Business Economics, Palgrave Macmillan;National Association for Business Economics, vol. 60(4), pages 245-247, October.
    18. repec:ebl:ecbull:v:2:y:2006:i:2:p:1-9 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Jason Oakes, 2016. "Rent-seeking and the tragedy of the commons: two approaches to problems of collective action in biology and economics," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 137-151, July.
    20. Antonella Rancan, 2021. "Econometric modelling in Italy: From economic planning to academic research," HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 10(1), pages 63-82.
    21. Selten, Reinhard, 2017. "The chain store paradox," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 18, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    22. N. Emrah Aydinonat, 2006. "Is the Invisible Hand un− Smithian? A Comment on Rothschild," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 2(2), pages 1-9.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • B10 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - General
    • B12 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - Classical (includes Adam Smith)
    • B15 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - Historical; Institutional; Evolutionary
    • O10 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - General
    • P16 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Capitalist Economies - - - Capitalist Institutions; Welfare State

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aoq:ekonom:y:2025:i:2:p:278-293. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tomasz Kwarcinski (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pteeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.