IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aop/jijote/v9y2021i2p42-57.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How formative are assessments for learning activities towards summative assessment?

Author

Listed:
  • Tilo Li

    (Tung Wah College)

  • Marine Yeung

    (Tung Wah College)

  • Eugene Li

    (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology)

  • Beeto Leung

    (Tung Wah College)

Abstract

To academics of higher education institutes, motiving, enhancing and improving student learning have never been easy. Different types of course work or continuous assessment or assessment for learning activities are designed to lead students to achieve the intended learning outcomes of respective courses. Depending on the nature of courses, these activities vary and they can either be done individually or in groups. The question is whether these activities can achieve their stated goals or if they can, how much these activities can lead students to achieve the intended learning outcomes as reflected by a summative assessment, normally it is a timed final exam or a take-home final essay. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the correlations between formative assessment activities and the summative assessment. Data of an introductory statistics course of different cohorts of a private degree-granting institute in Hong Kong were used in this study. The results indicate that individual assignments have a strong relationship with the exam score, while group projects do not. More surprisingly, group projects are negatively related to exam scores. The implication is that academics should rethink how to make group work a better and fairer assessment for individual student’s contribution.

Suggested Citation

  • Tilo Li & Marine Yeung & Eugene Li & Beeto Leung, 2021. "How formative are assessments for learning activities towards summative assessment?," International Journal of Teaching and Education, European Research Center, vol. 9(2), pages 42-57, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:aop:jijote:v:9:y:2021:i:2:p:42-57
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eurrec.org/ijote-article-116962
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://eurrec.org/ijote-article-116962?download=4
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tillotson Li, 2014. "A case study of peer-rater differences in Hong Kong," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 0200943, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Keywords

      Higher Education; Analysis of Education; Formative Assessment; Continuous Assessment; Assessment for Learning; Summative Assessment;
      All these keywords.

      JEL classification:

      • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions
      • I21 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Analysis of Education

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aop:jijote:v:9:y:2021:i:2:p:42-57. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jiri Rotschedl (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijote.eurrec.org/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.