Author
Abstract
Research Question: REA enterprise ontology framework, what is it good for? Motivation - The historical approach to accounting and management information system design was based on conventions expected by the end-users: debits and credits, accounting cycles, general ledger and journals, bank reconciliations, budgeting function, and select management reports. This approach resulted in gross inefficiencies, data-duplication, and inconsistencies, difficulty with system update, modification, porting, and restoration. An alternative system design theory has been in development since 1982, an approach that is easy to understand, formulate, document, and implement; an approach that applies a basic semantic model of structuring all information flow into a widely applicable enterprise ontology framework that facilitates economic activities and strategic planning for the whole enterprise. Yet, until now, this approach is insufficiently known and seldom utilized. Idea - Our purpose is to provide a comprehensive theory guide for anyone desiring to be acquainted with the REA. Data - We review 55 publications comprising dominant Resource-Events-Agents (REA) theory research. Tools - Methodologically, we obtain, classify, define, and discuss the content of major research streams within REA domain. Contribution - The paper's contribution is in structured and comprehensive review enabling a novice to REA reader time-efficient acquaintance with the intricacies and benefits of the ontology, and information system researchers with wide-ranging theory review in this domain. We conclude with a discussion of contentions and challenges surrounding REA theory and its future developmental directions.
Suggested Citation
Alexey Nikitkov, 2020.
"REA Model, Its Development and Integration as An Enterprise Ontology Framework,"
Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 19(3), pages 566-594, September.
Handle:
RePEc:ami:journl:v:19:y:2020:i:3:p:566-594
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- M4 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting
- N8 - Economic History - - Micro-Business History
- O3 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ami:journl:v:19:y:2020:i:3:p:566-594. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Cristina Tartavulea (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.