IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Assuming the Worst: The Shifting Sands of Pension Accounting

Listed author(s):
  • Alistair BYRNE

    (Towers Watson Actuarial Consulting, London, United Kingdom)

  • Iain CLACHER


    (University of Leeds, United Kingdom)

  • David HILLIER

    (University of Strathclyde, United Kingdom)

  • Allan HODGSON

    (University of Queensland Business School, Australia)

Registered author(s):

    Accounting for defined benefit pension plans is complex, and given the magnitude of many of these schemes relative to their corporate sponsor, understanding whether pension disclosures are value relevant is key to improving the quality of financial reports. The application of fair value accounting for pensions allows for a high level of managerial discretion with respect to ex ante accounting choices. Utilizing a sample of firms that apply FRS-17, we examine the main determinants of the assumptions managers use to arrive at pension scheme valuations. We find significant differences in the stated assumptions across companies, auditors and actuaries. Further, managers display considerable variation in conservatism when implementing fair value accounting, and this variation is related to scheme-specific characteristics, such as asset allocation and pension plan solvency. Crucially, pension disclosures are found to be value relevant, therefore, managers are able to present pension disclosures in a more favorable light, and this is reflected in prices. As a result of the observed inconsistency in reporting across firms, and the value relevance of these disclosures, this brings into question the efficacy of fair value accounting for assessing pension values.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies in its journal Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems.

    Volume (Year): 12 (2013)
    Issue (Month): 2 (June)
    Pages: 190-212

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:ami:journl:v:12:y:2013:i:2:p:190-212
    Contact details of provider:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ami:journl:v:12:y:2013:i:2:p:190-212. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Cristina Tartavulea)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.