IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aiy/journl/v3y2017i4p213-230.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Directions for optimizing of the economic framework as an instrument for regional development

Author

Listed:
  • Luchnikov, A. S.
  • Nikolaev, R. S.

Abstract

Modern economic development of the territories requires its comprehensive studies and analysis whereby methods of different sciences. Human geography is one of the most useful for it. In this article, the geographical model of the supporting framework of economy as a constructive tool in regional economic policy is considered. It has a linear-nodal structure and includes key elements of the economic development of the territories, among which are large urban agglomerations (economic nodes and local clusters), economic centers, as well as lines of material and intangible links between the basic elements of the economy. It is suggested that due to its universality and generalization, the economic framework allows determining the main features of the territorial organization of the economy, to indicate its shortcomings and advantages, to outline the points or areas of implementation of large investment projects and so on. On the example of the regions of the Volga Federal district, and in particular the Permskiy krai, the main territorial problems of the development of their economy are demonstrated: hypertrophied by uncharacteristic functions centers (regional capitals), weak regional periphery, lack of sufficient transport, marketing, production and other connectivity between different elements economy for the development of a large domestic consumer market and insufficient representation of modern types of innovative and investment infrastructure. A particular problem of the region's economy is the limited accessibility of some of its territories and the impossibility to build the shortest routes between disparate centers and nodes, which reduces the productivity of labor and the competitiveness of manufactured goods and services. Based on the indication of these problems in the territorial organization of the economy and on the basis of the model of the supporting framework, possible directions for their solution are presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Luchnikov, A. S. & Nikolaev, R. S., 2017. "Directions for optimizing of the economic framework as an instrument for regional development," R-Economy, Ural Federal University, Graduate School of Economics and Management, vol. 3(4), pages 213-230.
    • Handle: RePEc:aiy:journl:v:3:y:2017:i:4:p:213-230
    DOI: 10.15826/recon.2017.3.3.024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10995/57348
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15826/recon.2017.3.3.024?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Herbert Giersch, 1979. "Aspects of growth, structural change, and employment A schumpeterian perspective," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 115(4), pages 629-652, December.
    2. François Perroux, 1950. "Economic Space: Theory and Applications," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 64(1), pages 89-104.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arun Natarajan Hariharan & Arindam Biswas, 2020. "A Critical review of the Indian knowledge‐based industry location policy against its theoretical arguments," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(3), pages 431-454, June.
    2. Olena Borodina & Ihor Prokopa & Serhiy Kyryziuk & Viktor Yarovyi, 2020. "Rural Areas Development Fund as a Financial Instrument for Spatial Justice in Land Use and Sustainable Rural Development," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 3, pages 122-130, September.
    3. Kozyrevа Оlena & Sahaidak-Nikitiuk Rita & Yevtushenko Viktoriia & Derenskaya Yana & Ievtushenko Ganna, 2017. "Research of the level of socio-economic development of Ukrainian regions," Technology audit and production reserves, 4(36) 2017, Socionet;Technology audit and production reserves, vol. 4(5(36)), pages 4-15.
    4. Maciej Jagódka & Małgorzata Snarska, 2021. "The State of Human Capital and Innovativeness of Polish Voivodships in 2004–2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-20, November.
    5. Rafael Morais Pereira & Ana Cláudia Azevedo & Fabio Emanuel Farago & Felipe Mendes Borini, 2024. "Technological intensity and local socio‐economic development," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(2), pages 1043-1057, March.
    6. Jacques Poot & Bill Cochrane & Sandra Baxendine, 2005. "Description and Spatial Analysis of Employment Change in New Zealand Regions 1986-2001," Population Studies Centre Discussion Papers dp-57, University of Waikato, Te Ngira Institute for Population Research.
    7. Lilla Knop, 2019. "Development of Clusters in Poland," International Journal of Innovation and Economic Development, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 5(5), pages 15-25, December.
    8. Rinaldo Evangelista & Simona Iammarino & Valeria Mastrostefano & Alberto Silvani, 2002. "Looking for Regional Systems of Innovation: Evidence from the Italian Innovation Survey," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(2), pages 173-186.
    9. Oleksii Voronkov & Daria Serogina & Hanna Bazetska & Natalia Skliaruk, 2018. "Sustainable Development of the Region: The Spatial Dimension," RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA', FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(1), pages 11-24.
    10. Perlman, Mark, 1988. "The fundamental issues in the controversy of the policy paradigms: Policies, theories, and underpinnings," Kiel Working Papers 305, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    11. Shu-hen Chiang, 2018. "Assessing the Merits of the Urban-Led Policy in China: Spread or Backwash Effect?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-14, February.
    12. William H. Branson & Herbert Giersch & Peter G. Peterson, 1980. "Trends in United States International Trade and Investment since World War II," NBER Chapters, in: The American Economy in Transition, pages 183-274, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    13. Cedric Pugh, 1996. "'Urban Bias', the Political Economy of Development and Urban Policies for Developing Countries," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 33(7), pages 1045-1060, August.
    14. Jan Lambooy, 2010. "The Evolution of Spatial Patterns over Long Time-Horizons: The Relation with Technology and Economic Development," Chapters, in: Ron Boschma & Ron Martin (ed.), The Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography, chapter 22, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    15. Sergey Kovalenko & Natalia Bykovets, 2022. "Support For Cluster Initiatives And Cluster Policy (Case Study Of The Euroregion "The Lower Danube")," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 8(1).
    16. Sergey Kovalenko & Natalia Bykovets & Olena Kolmykova, 2021. "The "Lower Danube" Euroregion: Development Emergence Of The Environmental Management Cluster Forms," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 7(3).
    17. Gao, Kang & Yuan, Yijun, 2022. "Government intervention, spillover effect and urban innovation performance: Empirical evidence from national innovative city pilot policy in China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    18. Paul Westhead & Stephen Batstone, 1998. "Independent Technology-based Firms: The Perceived Benefits of a Science Park Location," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 35(12), pages 2197-2219, December.
    19. Robert J. Stimson, 2014. "Proximity and endogenous regional development," Chapters, in: André Torre & Frédéric Wallet (ed.), Regional Development and Proximity Relations, chapter 1, pages 47-93, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    20. Motoryn Ruslan & Prykhodko Kateryna & Ślusarczyk Bogusław, 2020. "Asymmetry of foreign trade turnover between Ukraine and Poland," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 21(2), pages 143-156, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aiy:journl:v:3:y:2017:i:4:p:213-230. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Irina Turgel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/seurfru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.