IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aiy/jnljtr/v6y2020i1p6-21.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why Did the Consolidated Tax Regime Cause Massive Losses in Tax Revenue in Russia?

Author

Listed:
  • Natalya S. Kostrykina
  • Andrey V. Korytin

Abstract

In Russia, the consolidated tax regime was introduced in 2012 but in 2019 the decision was made to abolish it from 2023. The initial reform purported to discourage companies from using transfer pricing for domestic transactions between companies of one group and to ensure a more just allocation of the corporate income tax across Russian regions. In practice, however, the government’s shortfall in tax revenue reached two billion US dollars in certain years or 0.15% of Russia’s GDP. Our analysis has shown that the publicly available data are, unfortunately, insufficient for assessing the success of this reform, in particular, whether the two above-mentioned goals were achieved. However, we can focus on the role the following two factors played in the budgetary losses. The first such factor is that profits and losses of group members can be consolidated within one accounting (fiscal) period. The second factor is that consolidated taxpayer groups shift their tax bases to regions with lower tax rates (in some cases, regions established tax preferences explicitly for the purpose of attracting members of these groups). These loopholes reveal the deficiencies of the Russian consolidation model: for example, the ‘everybody or nobody’ principle is not applied in Russia and consolidated taxpayer groups are allowed to form the perimeter of tax consolidation themselves. In this paper, statistical tax reporting data are used to estimate the total amount of the shortfall in tax revenue caused by the regional tax preferences granted to members of consolidated taxpayer groups. In some cases, as our analysis of regional tax legislation shows, these tax preferences were intended to ‘steal’ the tax base from other regions or at least to prevent the regions’ own tax bases from being ‘stolen’ by rivals. Judging by the total figures, regional tax competition had a negative influence on budgetary revenues. This, however, was not the main factor as the shortfall in revenue was mostly caused by the possibility of immediate offset of losses within consolidated taxpayer groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Natalya S. Kostrykina & Andrey V. Korytin, 2020. "Why Did the Consolidated Tax Regime Cause Massive Losses in Tax Revenue in Russia?," Journal of Tax Reform, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 6(1), pages 6-21.
  • Handle: RePEc:aiy:jnljtr:v:6:y:2020:i:1:p:6-21
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15826/jtr.2020.6.1.072
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://jtr.urfu.ru/fileadmin/user_upload/site_15907/main/Kostrykina_Korytin.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/http://dx.doi.org/10.15826/jtr.2020.6.1.072?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kirill M. Nikitin & Marina A. Avdienkova & Olga O. Zakharova & Eleonora A. Gilmanova, 2016. "Consolidated Groups of Taxpayers: How We Should Use the Moratorium," Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal, Financial Research Institute, Moscow 125375, Russia, issue 5, pages 37-51, October.
    2. Hentze, Tobias, 2019. "The challenge of moving to a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base in the EU," IW-Reports 2/2019, Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft (IW) / German Economic Institute.
    3. Dmitry A. Babenko, 2014. "Introduction of the Concept of the Consolidated Group of Taxpayers in Russia: Preliminary Results," Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal, Financial Research Institute, Moscow 125375, Russia, issue 2, pages 135-142, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. G. Dosi & L. Fanti & M. E. Virgillito, 2020. "Unequal societies in usual times, unjust societies in pandemic ones," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 47(3), pages 371-389, September.
    2. Vladimir Ilyin & Anna Povarova, 2019. "Consolidated Taxation and Its Consequences for Regional Budgets," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(1), pages 70-83.
    3. Ann-Christin Rathje, 2019. "Wie soll die Wirtschaftspolitik der Europäischen Union zukünftig aussehen? – Ergebnisse einer Unternehmensbefragung," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 72(23), pages 27-35, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aiy:jnljtr:v:6:y:2020:i:1:p:6-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Natalia Starodubets (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/seurfru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.