IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aip/access/v6y2025i3p532-545.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adapting to the AI revolution: comparative analysis of national workforce strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Saule ISKENDIROVA

    (Academy of Public Administration under the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Astana, Kazakhstan)

  • Aigerim AMIROVA

    (Academy of Public Administration under the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Astana, Kazakhstan)

  • Aliya DAUESHOVA

    (Academy of Public Administration under the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Astana, Kazakhstan)

  • Azamat ZHANSEITOV

    (Academy of Public Administration under the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Astana, Kazakhstan)

  • Rymkul ISMAILOVA

    (Astana IT University, Astana, Kazakhstan)

Abstract

This paper assesses national workforce strategies for adapting to artificial intelligence (AI) across 55 countries. The background of the research is defined by the rapid diffusion of AI technologies, which creates new challenges and opportunities for labour markets and policy-makers worldwide. Objectives: The primary objective is to identify the key determinants that drive the adoption of both skills-oriented and transformation-oriented strategies in national AI workforce development. Methods/Approach: The study constructs two composite indices—AI Skills Focus and AI Transformation Focus—based on employer survey data. These indices capture, respectively, the prioritization of hiring and training for AI-related skills, and the implementation of broader organizational strategies such as business model reorientation and workforce transitions driven by AI. Five explanatory variables are analyzed: funding for reskilling and upskilling, skills gaps in the labour market, the proportion of tasks performed by technology (human-machine frontier), labour-market churn, and the degree of organizational AI exposure. Results: The findings demonstrate that organizational AI exposure is the strongest and most consistent predictor of both indices, indicating that widespread AI adoption at the firm level is closely linked to national workforce adaptation. In contrast, larger skills gaps are associated with lower adoption of AI workforce strategies, suggesting that talent shortages impede rather than accelerate adaptation. Conclusions: The results highlight the importance of ecosystem-based approaches in public governance, where collaboration among government, employers, and education providers fosters readiness and adaptability. The study recommends policy measures focused on building supportive institutional environments and addressing skills shortages through integrated, long-term reforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Saule ISKENDIROVA & Aigerim AMIROVA & Aliya DAUESHOVA & Azamat ZHANSEITOV & Rymkul ISMAILOVA, 2025. "Adapting to the AI revolution: comparative analysis of national workforce strategies," Access Journal, Access Press Publishing House, vol. 6(3), pages 532-545, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:aip:access:v:6:y:2025:i:3:p:532-545
    DOI: 10.46656/access.2025.6.3(4)
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journal.access-bg.org/journalfiles/journal/issue-6-3-2025/adapting_to_the_ai_revolution-comparative_analysis_of_national_workforce_strategies.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.46656/access.2025.6.3(4)?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes
    • O57 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Comparative Studies of Countries
    • I28 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aip:access:v:6:y:2025:i:3:p:532-545. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mariana Petrova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://access-bg.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.