IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aif/report/v3y2021i1p1-8.html

Study on Effectiveness of Intermittent mechanical traction among the Patients with Lumbar disc herniation

Author

Listed:
  • A K M Rezwan

    (Gonoshasthaya Samaj Vittik Medical Collage, Mirzanagar, Savar, Dhaka-1344, Bangladesh.)

  • Tofajjol Hossain

    (Gonoshasthaya Samaj Vittik Medical Collage, Mirzanagar, Savar, Dhaka-1344, Bangladesh)

  • Md. Abir Hasan

    (Intern Physiotherapist, Gonoshasthaya Samaj Vittik Medical Collage, Mirzanagar, Savar, Dhaka-1344, Bangladesh)

  • Sidratul Muntaha

    (Gonoshasthaya Samaj Vittik Medical Collage, Mirzanagar, Savar, Dhaka-1344, Bangladesh)

  • Md. Shariful Islam

    (Gonoshasthaya Samaj Vittik Medical Collage, Mirzanagar, Savar, Dhaka-1344, Bangladesh)

  • Md. Asraful Islam

    (Gonoshasthaya Samaj Vittik Medical Collage, Mirzanagar, Savar, Dhaka-1344, Bangladesh)

Abstract

The low back pain is common problem shown in lumbar disc herniation. It produces pain in the lower back or leg especially in adult person. The disc loses its own structure and herniates outside due to disc compression. The purpose of this study was to find out the Effectiveness of intermittent mechanical traction among the patients with lumbar disc herniation. It was an experimental study design with 30 participants were included with selected Lumbar disc herniation and study was conducted in Gonoshasthaya samaj vittik medical college hospital, OPD of physiotherapy, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Non-randomize sampling technique & semi-structured questionnaire was used to collect the data. Subjects were divided into equal 2 groups. (Group-A. applied intermittent mechanical traction) and (Group-B. Applied Manual traction) The mean age of the respondents was (14 ± 8.485) and (30-49) year’s age group felt more pain and most of the respondents (83%) were male and weight were 66-70 kg. Day labour worker groups were 50% and worked daily average 5-8 hours and more of the respondent 67% carried over weight objects around 30 kg. most of the respondent 67% was no history of trauma and 43% of the respondent felt moderate types of pain and 44% of the respondents feels radiating nature of pain. More of the respondent 40% felt pain least 6 months Most of the respondent 67% felt pain during work and 83% visited doctor and 63% taken self-treatment before doctor visit. The statistical analysis of paired t test with14 degrees of freedom and 5% as level of significant. The pre and post test value value for VAS scale showed in intermitten mechanical traction group “t’’ value were 16.60 and manual traction group “t’’ value were 3.27 and tabulated t value were 2.145. The mean ± SD of pre and posttest value of Group A were 7.73±1.38 & 1.35±0.57 and Group B were 7.87±1.40 & 5.45 ± 2.50. Analysis of data showed that within-group comparison both groups showed significant improvement for all the parameters, whereas between-group comparison revealed higher improvement in Group A compared to the Group B. In this study the treatment of patients with signs of lumbar disc herniation the intermittent mechanical traction of lumbar spine seem more useful for the reduction of pain and improve functional activity.

Suggested Citation

  • A K M Rezwan & Tofajjol Hossain & Md. Abir Hasan & Sidratul Muntaha & Md. Shariful Islam & Md. Asraful Islam, 2021. "Study on Effectiveness of Intermittent mechanical traction among the Patients with Lumbar disc herniation," Journal of Scientific Reports, IJSAB International, vol. 3(1), pages 1-8.
  • Handle: RePEc:aif:report:v:3:y:2021:i:1:p:1-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ijsab.com/wp-content/uploads/1014.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ijsab.com/jsr-volume-3-issue-1/3493
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:abf:journl:v:31:y:2020:i:3:p:24253-24254 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aif:report:v:3:y:2021:i:1:p:1-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Farjana Rahman (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.