IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/uersra/289741.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can Manufacturing Reverse Rural Great Plains Depopulation?

Author

Listed:
  • McGranahan, David A.

Abstract

Manufacturing has been expanding in the rural Great Plains, more rapidly than in the rest of the rural United States, but much of the expansion has been to larger, growing places and much has been in meat packing, which tends to hire low-skill workers—a group in relatively short supply in much of the region. Manufacturers in areas of substantial population loss report problems with finding labor and, even more often, with the attractiveness of the area to managers and professionals. The rural Great Plains seems particularly suited to advanced technology manufacturing, if the problem of attracting managers and professionals could be eased. Manufacturers in the region participate heavily in government programs, but no more so than in other rural regions. Those in areas of decline have tended to receive greater support.

Suggested Citation

  • McGranahan, David A., 1998. "Can Manufacturing Reverse Rural Great Plains Depopulation?," Rural America/ Rural Development Perspectives, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 13(1), February.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:uersra:289741
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.289741
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/289741/files/rdp298f.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.289741?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Loewe, Paula & Van der Sluis, Evert, 2000. "Socioeconomic Conditions For And Impacts Of Establishing And Operating A New Generation Cooperative: The Case Of The South Dakota Soybean Processors," 2000 Annual Meeting, June 29-July 1, 2000, Vancouver, British Columbia 36490, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    2. Leistritz, F. Larry & Sell, Randall S., 2000. "Agricultural Processing Plants In North Dakota: Socioeconomic Impacts," Agricultural Economics Reports 23470, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    3. Artz, Georgeanne M. & Jackson, Rebecca & Orazem, Peter F., 2010. "Is It a Jungle Out There? Meat Packing, Immigrants, and Rural Communities," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 35(2), pages 1-17, August.
    4. Meri Davlasheridze & Pinar C. Geylani, 2017. "Small Business vulnerability to floods and the effects of disaster loans," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 865-888, December.
    5. Van der Sluis, Evert & Loewe, Paula, 2000. "The South Dakota Soybean Processors Cooperative: Socioeconomic Impacts," 2000 Annual Meeting, December 12-13 31811, NCERA-194 Research on Cooperatives.
    6. Schluter, Gerald E. & Lee, Chinkook, 2004. "Is There a Link between the Changing Skills of Labor Used in U.S. Processed Food Trade and Rural Employment?," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 36(3), pages 1-13, December.
    7. Adamson, Dwight W. & Waugh, Andrew, 2012. "Farm Operator Entry and Exit Behavior: A Longitudinal Analysis," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 124053, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    8. Katherine Curtis White, 2008. "Population change and farm dependence: Temporal and spatial variation in the U.S. great plains, 1900–2000," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 45(2), pages 363-386, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uersra:289741. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.