IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/pdcbeh/245000.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of states and forms of capitalism: An empirical examination of their relationship

Author

Listed:
  • Girdenas, Sarunas
  • Giedraitis, Vincentas
  • Rasteniene, Ausra

Abstract

Given the current economic crisis, we find this time of economic analysis to be both timely, and useful in determining which economic “style” is most supportive countries’ development in global capitalism. The goal of this paper is to determine which form of capitalism is most supportive the country’s development. The hypothesis that is raised in this paper is “The countries with the Liberal Market Economics system are more developed than Coordinated Market economics system countries”. This paper uses Hall and Soskice’s (2001) theoretical approach to varieties of capitalism to analyze countries’ competitiveness according to the World Economic Forum (WEF) and International Institute For Development Management (IMD) competitiveness indices. We use Knell and Srholec’s (2005) introduced methodology to calculate the index of coordination, which determines a country’s type of capitalism. The index consists of 12 variables, which later are divided into 4 groups according to the factor analysis results. Calculations confirmed the main differences, indicated in the literature, between two forms of capitalism at opposite extremes: Liberal Market Economies (LME) and Coordinated Market Economies (CME). Moreover, we discovered that CME is more supportive according to the human development rankings.

Suggested Citation

  • Girdenas, Sarunas & Giedraitis, Vincentas & Rasteniene, Ausra, 2013. "Development of states and forms of capitalism: An empirical examination of their relationship," Business and Economic Horizons (BEH), Prague Development Center (PRADEC), vol. 9(1), pages 1-14, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:pdcbeh:245000
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.245000
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/245000/files/201607040556_01_BEH_Vol9_Issue1_Girdenas_et_al_Development_states_forms_capitalism_empirical_examination_relationship_pp.1-14.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.245000?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Agricultural and Food Policy;

    JEL classification:

    • F12 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Models of Trade with Imperfect Competition and Scale Economies; Fragmentation
    • P11 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Capitalist Economies - - - Planning, Coordination, and Reform
    • P21 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist and Transition Economies - - - Planning, Coordination, and Reform

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pdcbeh:245000. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pradecz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.