IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/naprej/292059.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of Beneficiaries Satisfaction with FADAMA III/SEEFOR Funded Rural Infrastructures and Productive Assets

Author

Listed:
  • Ike, P.C.

Abstract

The study sought to ascertain productive assets provided by FADAMA III/SEEFOR project to beneficiaries and the proportion of beneficiaries that are satisfied with operation, maintenance and utilization of the productive assets. It also identified the rural infrastructural subprojects provided by FADAMA III/SEEFOR project and the impact of these subprojects on beneficiaries' income. A sample of 170 respondents, comprising of 120 direct project beneficiaries and 50 non beneficiaries were drawn from the five local government areas under study. Data were generated with the use of structured questionnaire and analyzed through the use on descriptive statistics and the Difference in Difference method. Results indicate that 119 respondents representing 70% of the respondents were males while 38.82% were aged between 30 and 39 years; and 84.71% are married. Three enterprises including snailry, pepper and cassava processing enterprises were not satisfied with operation, maintenance and utilization of the productive assets provided to them. Average annual income of beneficiary households before the project implementation in the local government areas was N174,785.00 while that of non beneficiaries was N177,015.00 prior to the establishment of rural infrastructural subprojects. With the implementation of the project, the average income of all type of respondents' enterprises rose to N186,306.17 while that of non participants averaged to N178,662.17 implying an increase in income by 6.59% and 0.09% for participants and non-participants in the project respectively. It is recommended that the project should entrench proper measures towards ensuring that service providers execute projects to specification as this will improve the interest of the project to beneficiaries.

Suggested Citation

  • Ike, P.C., 2016. "Assessment of Beneficiaries Satisfaction with FADAMA III/SEEFOR Funded Rural Infrastructures and Productive Assets," Nigerian Agricultural Policy Research Journal (NAPReJ), Agricultural Policy Research Network (APRNet), vol. 1(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:naprej:292059
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.292059
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/292059/files/Ike.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.292059?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:naprej:292059. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aprneea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.