IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/joafsc/362791.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rethinking sustainable food supply chains: The role of stakeholders’ place identity

Author

Listed:
  • Zhao, Yu-Jie
  • Wu, Kuan-Ting
  • Wang, Jiun-Hao

Abstract

Introduction The food supply chain (FSC) plays a fundamental role in human society, making its sustainable trans­formation a crucial issue (Horea-Milcu et al., 2020; Loorbach et al., 2017; Scoones et al., 2020). The significant impact of COVID-19 has further emphasized the importance of developing a sus­tainable food supply chain (SFSC) (Aday & Aday, 2020; Brewin, 2020; Galanakis, 2020). However, sustainability transitions cannot be driven by policy alone; bottom-up initiatives from local stakeholders are equally essential. Despite the growing body of literature on sustainable food supply chain manage­ment (SFSCM), one key aspect remains underex­plored: the role of place identity in shaping bot­tom-up stakeholder engagement in sustainability practices. Interviews with FSC stakeholders in Yunlin County, Taiwan (Figure 1), suggest that place identity is a significant driver of their actions to further sustainability. This factor has received limited academic attention in SFSC discussions, however. To address this gap, this commentary argues that integrating place identity into SFSC research offers a more nuanced understanding of how sustainability transitions unfold at the local level. Building on these insights, we propose a potential strategy for integrating agri-food educa­tion with the tourism industry through leveraging of place identity. This approach can foster local engagement and support long-term sustainable transformations. We also emphasize the value of interdisciplinary perspectives, particularly linking SFSC studies with human geography, to better understand place-based sustainability transitions.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhao, Yu-Jie & Wu, Kuan-Ting & Wang, Jiun-Hao, 2025. "Rethinking sustainable food supply chains: The role of stakeholders’ place identity," Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, Center for Transformative Action, Cornell University, vol. 14(3).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:joafsc:362791
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/362791/files/1350.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yuliia Maksymiv & Valentyna Yakubiv & Nadia Pylypiv & Iryna Hryhoruk & Iryna Piatnychuk & Nazariy Popadynets, 2021. "Strategic Challenges for Sustainable Governance of the Bioeconomy: Preventing Conflict between SDGs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-12, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karpiak Maria & Duma Oleh & Halachenko Oleksandr & Sorokivska Olena & Zvirych Vitaliy & Drebot Oksana & Sakharnatska Liudmyla, 2023. "Development of Medical Infrastructure of Territorial Communities of Ukraine in the Conditions of Sectoral Reforms," Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, Sciendo, vol. 45(3), pages 276-286, September.
    2. Delia-Elena Diaconașu & Ionel Bostan & Cristina Căutișanu & Irina Chiriac, 2022. "Insights into the Sustainable Development of the Bioeconomy at the European Level, in the Context of the Desired Clean Environment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-14, September.
    3. Florian Siekmann & Sandra Venghaus, 2024. "Regional transformation pathways for the bioeconomy: A novel monitoring approach for complex transitions," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 28(3), pages 603-616, June.
    4. Matteo Trane & Luisa Marelli & Alice Siragusa & Riccardo Pollo & Patrizia Lombardi, 2023. "Progress by Research to Achieve the Sustainable Development Goals in the EU: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-37, April.
    5. Yasmin Imparato Maximo & Mariana Hassegawa & Pieter Johannes Verkerk & André Luiz Missio, 2022. "Forest Bioeconomy in Brazil: Potential Innovative Products from the Forest Sector," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-24, August.
    6. Abbas Abdul, 2023. "Policy seduction and governance resistance? Examining public funding agencies and academic institutions on decarbonisation research," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 50(1), pages 87-101.
    7. Alina Yakymchuk & Oksana Kardash & Nazariy Popadynets & Valentyna Yakubiv & Yuliia Maksymiv & Iryna Hryhoruk & Taras Kotsko, 2022. "Modeling and Governance of the Country s Energy Security: The Example of Ukraine," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 12(5), pages 280-286, September.
    8. Christina-Ioanna Papadopoulou & Efstratios Loizou & Fotios Chatzitheodoridis, 2022. "Priorities in Bioeconomy Strategies: A Systematic Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-15, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:joafsc:362791. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.