IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/joafsc/360143.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Analysis of Four Maple Species for Syrup Production in South-Central Appalachia

Author

Listed:
  • Peters, Jacob
  • Huish, Ryan
  • Taylor, Dakota
  • Munson, Benjamin

Abstract

Sugar maple (Acer saccharum L.) is a key cultural and economic resource from eastern Canada to south-central Appalachia. Environmental uncertainties could create problems for this iconic species, in particular affecting the southern extent of its range and thus increasing the need for alternative species in maple syrup production. To mediate uncertain­ties, some producers tap additional species, including box elder (Acer negundo L.), red maple (Acer rubrum L.), and silver maple (Acer saccharinum L.). For viable marketability, sap from alternative species should be comparable to sugar maple in volume and sugar concentration. In the 2016 and 2017 tapping seasons, data were collected on sap volume and sap sugar concentration (SSC) for each of these maple species. Sap parameter performance data revealed box elder and to a lesser extent silver maple as the most appropriate alternative species for syrup production in the south-central Appa­lachian region, while red maple, which is a com­monly tapped species in northern regions, per­formed comparably in SSC but very poorly in sap volume in this study. Diversifying sap sources could provide additional sap and tree counts avail­able to producers, allowing for more varied man­agement strategies to mediate climatic variations and uncertainties. This diversification can also allow for industry expansion into areas without sufficient sugar maples and potentially create a new product niche in the maple industry, which can promote rural economic development in south-central Appalachia through ways compatible with other sustainable agroforestry and outdoor tourism efforts. See the press release for this article.

Suggested Citation

  • Peters, Jacob & Huish, Ryan & Taylor, Dakota & Munson, Benjamin, 2020. "Comparative Analysis of Four Maple Species for Syrup Production in South-Central Appalachia," Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, Center for Transformative Action, Cornell University, vol. 9(2).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:joafsc:360143
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/360143/files/776.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel Houle & Alain Paquette & Benoît Côté & Travis Logan & Hugues Power & Isabelle Charron & Louis Duchesne, 2015. "Impacts of Climate Change on the Timing of the Production Season of Maple Syrup in Eastern Canada," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-14, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thapa, Bobby & Ochuodho, Thomas O. & Lhotka, John M. & Thomas, William & Muller, Jacob & Brandeis, Thomas J. & Olale, Edward & Zhou, Mo & Liang, Jingjing, 2025. "Economic impacts of maple syrup production potential in Kentucky: Input-output analysis," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    2. repec:plo:pone00:0215511 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Bizikova, Livia & Larkin, Patricia & Mitchell, Scott & Waldick, Ruth, 2019. "An indicator set to track resilience to climate change in agriculture: A policy-maker’s perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 444-456.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:joafsc:360143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.