IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/jloagb/14715.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Gross Margin Comparison Of Returns To Nematicide Treatment In Continuous And Rotation Triticale-Soybean Production

Author

Listed:
  • Stark, C. Robert, Jr.
  • Dowler, C.C.
  • Johnson, A.W.
  • Baker, S.H.

Abstract

A study of irrigated strip-till soybean production compared gross margins over nematicide expense for a continuous triticale-soybean system versus a two-year rotation system alternating triticale-soybean with triticale-cotton. Half of the replicated plots under each system received nematicide treatment. Gross margins were calculated using recorded yields and Georgia average market prices by marketing years. Mean gross margins for untreated plots were not significantly different between crop-sequence systems. Within each system, however, mean gross margins were significantly higher for plots not receiving nematicide treatment versus treated plots, even when treated plots produced greater yields.

Suggested Citation

  • Stark, C. Robert, Jr. & Dowler, C.C. & Johnson, A.W. & Baker, S.H., 2000. "A Gross Margin Comparison Of Returns To Nematicide Treatment In Continuous And Rotation Triticale-Soybean Production," Journal of Agribusiness, Agricultural Economics Association of Georgia, vol. 18(3).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:jloagb:14715
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://purl.umn.edu/14715
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ederington, Louis H, 1979. "The Hedging Performance of the New Futures Markets," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 34(1), pages 157-170, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jloagb:14715. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/aeaggea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.