IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ijaeri/339016.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Characteristics of Vegetables and Fruit Firms and their Relationship with Business Risk

Author

Listed:
  • Rasimikayati, Elly
  • Karyani, Tuti
  • Rachmat Saefudin, Bobby

Abstract

In this global era, there has been a rapid increase in the sale and purchase of vegetables and fruits, but the level of income from these businesses still fluctuates. The purpose of this research is to describe the character of the fruit and vegetable business in Indonesia, and to find out the relationship between this and the business risks. The method used is a survey method on 43 business units. The data analysis technique used is descriptive analysis and to test the relationship of variables used the Chi-Square test with representation using cross tabulation. The results of this study indicate that more respondents sell fruit commodities than vegetables, namely as many as 24 business units. the majority of business lengths are in the range of 10-20 years with 35 business units, the form of the company tends to vary with the most forms of trading business with 10 business units. Many businesses are privately owned, with as many as 25 business units, the Company's Net Worth (Excluding Land and Buildings) is dominated in the range of 50 million-500 million. Asset categories tend to be small, namely under Rp. 250 million, with an income level of < Rp. 50 million/year. Developing and stable conditions dominate the business conditions category, with the majority of business units having no loans. A total of 41 business founders were male, and the last education of the founders was quite high, namely 15 high school graduates and 15 undergraduate graduates. Another result is that there is a significant relationship between income level and business risk, as well as ownership status and loan level to legal and legality risks.

Suggested Citation

  • Rasimikayati, Elly & Karyani, Tuti & Rachmat Saefudin, Bobby, . "Characteristics of Vegetables and Fruit Firms and their Relationship with Business Risk," International Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Research, Malwa International Journals Publication, vol. 9(4).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ijaeri:339016
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.339016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/339016/files/ijaer_09__36.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.339016?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roychowdhury, Sugata & Shroff, Nemit & Verdi, Rodrigo S., 2019. "The effects of financial reporting and disclosure on corporate investment: A review," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(2).
    2. Kanchan Das & Reza S. Lashkari, 2015. "Risk readiness and resiliency planning for a supply chain," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(22), pages 6752-6771, November.
    3. Marly Monteiro de Carvalho & Roque Rabechini Junior, 2015. "Impact of risk management on project performance: the importance of soft skills," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(2), pages 321-340, January.
    4. Muliadi Muliadi & Dio Caisar Darma & Jati Kasuma, 2020. "MSMEs as mediation in the effects of investment credit, interest rates, and labor on economic growth: Evidence from Indonesia," International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies, Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 9(2), pages 01-12, April.
    5. Zuzana Virglerova & Francesca Conte & John Amoah & Maria Rita Massaro, 2020. "The Perception Of Legal Risk And Its Impact On The Business Of Smes," International Journal of Entrepreneurial Knowledge, Center for International Scientific Research of VSO and VSPP, vol. 8(2), pages 1-13, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aziz Barhmi & Omar Hajaji, 2023. "Multidisciplinary Approach to Supply Chain Resilience: Conceptualization and Scale Development," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2023(5), pages 43-69.
    2. Jungbae Kim, 2024. "The effect of PCAOB inspections on corporate innovation: evidence from deficiencies about the valuation of intangibles," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 1491-1523, June.
    3. Matthias Breuer, 2025. "Correction to “How Does Financial‐Reporting Regulation Affect Industry‐Wide Resource Allocation?”," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 63(2), pages 1031-1055, May.
    4. Tobias Witter & Thorsten Sellhorn & Jens Müller & Vicky Kiosse, 2022. "Balance sheet smoothing," Berlin School of Economics Discussion Papers 0006, Berlin School of Economics.
    5. Matthew Kubic, 2025. "The benefits of article 11 pro forma disclosure," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 2768-2821, September.
    6. Gurpal Sran & Marcel Tuijn & Lauren Vollon, 2024. "The Capital Market Effects of Centralizing Regulated Financial Information," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 62(4), pages 1497-1532, September.
    7. Breuer, Matthias & Leuz, Christian & Vanhaverbeke, Steven, 2025. "Reporting regulation and corporate innovation," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(1).
    8. Christensen, Theodore E. & D'Adduzio, Jenna & Nelson, Karen K., 2023. "Explaining accruals quality over time," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(1).
    9. Junsheng Zhang & Xuefeng Jing & Yue Qi, 2024. "Disclosure frequency of parent company financial reporting: Insights from analyst forecasting accuracy," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 64(4), pages 3657-3683, December.
    10. Abigail Allen & Melissa F. Lewis‐Western & Kristen Valentine, 2022. "The Innovation and Reporting Consequences of Financial Regulation for Young Life‐Cycle Firms," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 60(1), pages 45-95, March.
    11. Hans B. Christensen & Luzi Hail & Christian Leuz, 2021. "Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 1176-1248, September.
    12. Zhao, Yujie & Yang, Yuanyuan & Hua, Min & Chan, Kam C., 2024. "Social credit scoring system and corporate pollution governance: Insights from China's Social Credit System Construction," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PB).
    13. Silvia Martínez-Perales & Isabel Ortiz-Marcos & Jesús Juan Ruiz & Francisco Javier Lázaro, 2018. "Using Certification as a Tool to Develop Sustainability in Project Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-18, May.
    14. Neururer, Thaddeus, 2022. "Meet-or-beat streak heterogeneity and equity prices," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 455-470.
    15. Armstrong, Daphne M. & Glaeser, Stephen & Hoopes, Jeffrey L., 2025. "Measuring firm exposure to government agencies," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(1).
    16. Tor Guimaraes & Ketan Paranjape & Mike Cornick & Curtis P. Armstrong, 2018. "Empirically Testing Factors Increasing Manufacturing Product Innovation Success," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(02), pages 1-26, April.
    17. Adams, Paul & Hunt, Stefan & Palmer, Christopher & Zaliauskas, Redis, 2021. "Testing the effectiveness of consumer financial disclosure: Experimental evidence from savings accounts," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 122-147.
    18. Jifan Hu & Yeyao Tang & Na Yin & Xiang Guo, 2024. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Institutional Investor Information Competition and Accounting Information Transparency: Implications for Financial Markets and Corporate Governance in China," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 9629-9666, June.
    19. Lin, Yu-En & Xu, Yu-Xin & Yu, Bo & Lam, Keith S.K., 2025. "The impact of outcome uncertainty on corporate investment compensation peer effects," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    20. Marcelo Ortiz, 2020. "Financial disclosure environment and the cash policy of private firms," Economics Working Papers 1692, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ijaeri:339016. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://ijaer.in/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.