IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ijaeri/339016.html

Characteristics of Vegetables and Fruit Firms and their Relationship with Business Risk

Author

Listed:
  • Rasimikayati, Elly
  • Karyani, Tuti
  • Rachmat Saefudin, Bobby

Abstract

In this global era, there has been a rapid increase in the sale and purchase of vegetables and fruits, but the level of income from these businesses still fluctuates. The purpose of this research is to describe the character of the fruit and vegetable business in Indonesia, and to find out the relationship between this and the business risks. The method used is a survey method on 43 business units. The data analysis technique used is descriptive analysis and to test the relationship of variables used the Chi-Square test with representation using cross tabulation. The results of this study indicate that more respondents sell fruit commodities than vegetables, namely as many as 24 business units. the majority of business lengths are in the range of 10-20 years with 35 business units, the form of the company tends to vary with the most forms of trading business with 10 business units. Many businesses are privately owned, with as many as 25 business units, the Company's Net Worth (Excluding Land and Buildings) is dominated in the range of 50 million-500 million. Asset categories tend to be small, namely under Rp. 250 million, with an income level of < Rp. 50 million/year. Developing and stable conditions dominate the business conditions category, with the majority of business units having no loans. A total of 41 business founders were male, and the last education of the founders was quite high, namely 15 high school graduates and 15 undergraduate graduates. Another result is that there is a significant relationship between income level and business risk, as well as ownership status and loan level to legal and legality risks.

Suggested Citation

  • Rasimikayati, Elly & Karyani, Tuti & Rachmat Saefudin, Bobby, . "Characteristics of Vegetables and Fruit Firms and their Relationship with Business Risk," International Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Research, Malwa International Journals Publication, vol. 9(4).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ijaeri:339016
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.339016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/339016/files/ijaer_09__36.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.339016?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kanchan Das & Reza S. Lashkari, 2015. "Risk readiness and resiliency planning for a supply chain," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(22), pages 6752-6771, November.
    2. Zuzana Virglerova & Francesca Conte & John Amoah & Maria Rita Massaro, 2020. "The Perception Of Legal Risk And Its Impact On The Business Of Smes," International Journal of Entrepreneurial Knowledge, Center for International Scientific Research of VSO and VSPP, vol. 8(2), pages 1-13, June.
    3. Marly Monteiro de Carvalho & Roque Rabechini Junior, 2015. "Impact of risk management on project performance: the importance of soft skills," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(2), pages 321-340, January.
    4. Muliadi Muliadi & Dio Caisar Darma & Jati Kasuma, 2020. "MSMEs as mediation in the effects of investment credit, interest rates, and labor on economic growth: Evidence from Indonesia," International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies, Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 9(2), pages 01-12, April.
    5. Roychowdhury, Sugata & Shroff, Nemit & Verdi, Rodrigo S., 2019. "The effects of financial reporting and disclosure on corporate investment: A review," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(2).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mansoor Shekarian & Mahour Parast, 2021. "Do Entrepreneurship Skills Improve Project Performance? A Project-Based Learning Perspective," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 30(2), pages 267-305, September.
    2. Hemant Kushwaha & Sanjay Kumar Mishra & Manoj Kumar, 2023. "Management of litigation risk by Indian MSMEs," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(2), pages 321-336, June.
    3. Rocío Rodríguez-Rivero & Isabel Ortiz-Marcos & Luis Ballesteros-Sánchez & Xabier Martínez-Beneitez, 2020. "Identifying Risks for Better Project Management between Two Different Cultures: The Chinese and the Spanish," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-14, September.
    4. Riaz, Zahid & Ray, Pradeep & Ray, Sangeeta, 2022. "The impact of digitalisation on corporate governance in Australia," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 410-424.
    5. Aziz Barhmi & Omar Hajaji, 2023. "Multidisciplinary Approach to Supply Chain Resilience: Conceptualization and Scale Development," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2023(5), pages 43-69.
    6. Zhewen Li & Konstantinos A. Athanasiadis & Michail I. Fygkioris & Dimitrios N. Koufopoulos, 2024. "Financial Reporting Quality, CEO Age, and Investment Efficiency: Evidence from the U.S. Market," New Challenges in Accounting and Finance, EUROKD, vol. 11, pages 29-53.
    7. Ferracuti, Elia, 2022. "Information uncertainty and organizational design," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(1).
    8. Stewart, Christopher R., 2023. "Appraisal rights and corporate disclosure during mergers and acquisitions," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(1).
    9. Jungbae Kim, 2024. "The effect of PCAOB inspections on corporate innovation: evidence from deficiencies about the valuation of intangibles," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 1491-1523, June.
    10. Yadong Wang & Khaldoon Albitar & Imad Chbib, 2024. "Connecting the dots: A systematic review of corporate social responsibility, information asymmetry, and economic implications," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 5012-5031, September.
    11. Tobias Witter & Thorsten Sellhorn & Jens Müller & Vicky Kiosse, 2022. "Balance sheet smoothing," Berlin School of Economics Discussion Papers 0006, Berlin School of Economics.
    12. Jing Lu & Guohua Cao & Chuan Lin & Stavros Sindakis & Saloome Showkat, 2024. "Corporate Site Visits and Stock Price Crash Risk: The Role of Institutional Investors’ Knowledge Acquisitions," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 9082-9114, June.
    13. Elena Fedorova & Kirsi Aaltonen & Eva Pongrácz, 2020. "Social Sustainability Dilemma: Escape or Communicate? Managing Social Risks Upstream of the Bioenergy Supply Chain," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-17, January.
    14. Akter, Aysha & Khalifa, Mariem & Sualihu, Mohammed Aminu, 2025. "Diversified firms and corporate labor policy: The role of managerial equity incentives," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    15. R. L. N. Murthy & Hardeep Singh Mundi, 2023. "Stock Return Synchronicity and Profitability: Evidence from India," Paradigm, , vol. 27(1), pages 47-59, June.
    16. Matthew Kubic, 2025. "The benefits of article 11 pro forma disclosure," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 2768-2821, September.
    17. Gurpal Sran & Marcel Tuijn & Lauren Vollon, 2024. "The Capital Market Effects of Centralizing Regulated Financial Information," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 62(4), pages 1497-1532, September.
    18. Haga, Jesper & Högholm, Kenneth & Sundvik, Dennis, 2022. "Peer firms’ reporting frequency and stock price synchronicity: European evidence," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    19. Hossain, Ashrafee T. & Masum, Abdullah-Al & Xu, Jian, 2023. "COVID-19, a blessing in disguise for the Tech sector: Evidence from stock price crash risk," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    20. Breuer, Matthias & Leuz, Christian & Vanhaverbeke, Steven, 2025. "Reporting regulation and corporate innovation," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(1).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ijaeri:339016. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://ijaer.in/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.