IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/gewipr/212804.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mathematische Modelle als Entscheidungshilfen bei Unsicherheit – Gegenwärtiger Stand, neuere Entwicklungen

Author

Listed:
  • Hanf, E.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Hanf, E., 1976. "Mathematische Modelle als Entscheidungshilfen bei Unsicherheit – Gegenwärtiger Stand, neuere Entwicklungen," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 13.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:gewipr:212804
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.212804
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/212804/files/Bd13Nr09.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.212804?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Boussard, J. M., 1969. "The introduction of risk into a programming model: Different criteria and the actual behavior of farmers," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 92-121.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Damien Jourdain & Juliette Lairez & Bruno Striffler & François Affholder, 2020. "Farmers’ preference for cropping systems and the development of sustainable intensification: a choice experiment approach," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 101(4), pages 417-437, December.
    2. Damien Jourdain1,2,3 & Juliette Lairez4,5 & Bruno Striffler & François Affholder, 2020. "Farmers’ preference for cropping systems and the development of sustainable intensification: a choice experiment approach," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 101(4), pages 417-437.
    3. Damien Jourdain & Juliette Lairez & Bruno Striffler & François Affholder, 2020. "Farmers’ preference for cropping systems and the development of sustainable intensification: a choice experiment approach," Post-Print hal-02995632, HAL.
    4. Catherine Laurent & Françoise Maxime & Armelle Mazé & Muriel Tichit, 2003. "Multifonctionnalité de l'agriculture et modèles de l'exploitation agricole," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 273(1), pages 134-152.
    5. Jourdain, Damien & Lairez, Juliette & Striffler, Bruno & Affholder, François, 2020. "Farmers’ preference for cropping systems and the development of sustainable intensification: a choice experiment approach," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 101(4), March.
    6. Meyer, Jack & Robison, Lindon J., 1986. "A Consistency Condition For Expected Utility And Mean Variance Analysis," 1986 Annual Meeting, July 27-30, Reno, Nevada 278153, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    7. Throsby, C.D., 1973. "New Methodologies in Agricultural Production Economics: a Review," 1973 Conference, August 19-30, 1973, São Paulo, Brazil 181385, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Abbey, A. Georges & Pagoulatos, Angelos, 1993. "The Joint Hypothesis of Efficiency and Safety in Farm Portfolio Choices: The example of Settat, Morocco," Agricultural Economics Research Reports 140076, University of Kentucky, Department of Agricultural Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Risk and Uncertainty;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:gewipr:212804. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gewisea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.