IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/erdnra/139078.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Networking rural expertise

Author

Listed:
  • Muilu, Toivo
  • Kotavaara, Niina

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to analyse emergence of rural expert networks and their function on the basis of an example network. The case study concerns the European Rural Development Network (ERDN). Networking has been regarded as a central model of action during this century for most of fields of society and economy. The European Union emphasizes the role of cooperation between the Member States, organizations and regions. In addition, the EU research framework programmes are based on existing or project-based research networks in most cases. The number of rural networks has risen rapidly during the last years at regional, national as well as international level. In countries dominated by rural areas, especially in those with small population and sparse population structure, the need for networking has been highlighted because of low and scattered number of rural development actors and experts. There is a need to unite the limited resources. Networking is also expected to create new innovations, increase productivity and save public resources. The ERDN originates from Poland in 2002, and since then, the network has expanded such that in 2009 it aggregated rural researchers from around 20 European countries. The empirical material of this paper consists of a web survey directed at participants of ERDN. The survey was carried out in the spring of 2009. The results suggest that the hard-core group of actors is rather small, but they have managed to create and maintain an alive and innovative network of rural researchers. Involvement among the participants seems to have increased during the years, although there are many of those who just “visit” the meetings only once. So far, the network has been relative easy to manage due to the relatively small number of participants but, however, the possible expansion of the network may lead to a need for a new kind of organizational structure. According to opinions of ERDN participants, the greatest future challenges for the network are connected to ideas on even more profound forms of international research cooperation and accomplishment of research applications and proposals.

Suggested Citation

  • Muilu, Toivo & Kotavaara, Niina, 2010. "Networking rural expertise," Rural Areas and Development, European Rural Development Network (ERDN), vol. 7, pages 1-16.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:erdnra:139078
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.139078
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/139078/files/2010-RAD-07-04-MUILU_51-66.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.139078?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark Casson & Marina Della Giusta (ed.), 2008. "The Economics of Networks," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 2194.
    2. Gary Paul Green, 2007. "Workforce Development Networks in Rural Areas," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 4202.
    3. Muilu, Toivo, 2007. "Rural Studies network of Finland - a national approach to networking rural expertise," Rural Areas and Development, European Rural Development Network (ERDN), vol. 5, pages 1-11.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Muilu Toivo & Kotavaara Niina, 2011. "Diffusion, social structure and functioning of scientific rural networks: comparison of European and Finish examples," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 3(1), pages 66-82, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muilu Toivo & Kotavaara Niina, 2011. "Diffusion, social structure and functioning of scientific rural networks: comparison of European and Finish examples," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 3(1), pages 66-82, January.
    2. Eren Inci & Simon C. Parker, 2013. "Financing Entrepreneurship and the Old‐Boy Network," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(2), pages 232-258, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:erdnra:139078. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/erdnnea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.