IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/earnsa/28770.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Eficiencia de las reglas de asignacion de agua en el regadio: asignacion a traves de mercados, de la regla proporcional y de la regla uniforme

Author

Listed:
  • Goetz, Renan-Ulrich
  • Martinez, Yolanda Martinez
  • Rodrigo, Jofre

Abstract

En el presente trabajo se simula la introducción de diferentes métodos de reparto del agua en la agricultura, y se aplican a una zona de regadío del valle central del Ebro. En concreto, se han escogido tres métodos diferentes de asignación con el fin de comparar su eficiencia económica. Además del actual sistema proporcional y el sistema de mercado, se simulará la introducción de la regla de reparto uniforme, desarrollada en la teoría de la elección social. Los resultados permiten concluir que aunque el mercado de agua conduzca a mejores resultados globales en todos los casos, la regla uniforme puede resultar una alternativa interesante cuando las dotaciones de agua se encuentran en el intervalo habitual, mientras que en situaciones de escasez severa de agua, el mercado presenta una ventaja más clara con respecto a cualquier otro sistema de asignación. Asimismo, los resultados demuestran que los niveles superiores de heterogeneidad entre los usuarios y altos precios administrativos del agua representan situaciones más ventajosas para la aplicación de la regla de asignación uniforme en comparación con el actual sistema proporcional. Palabras clave: agricultura, gestión del agua de riego, mercado de agua, elección social.

Suggested Citation

  • Goetz, Renan-Ulrich & Martinez, Yolanda Martinez & Rodrigo, Jofre, 2005. "Eficiencia de las reglas de asignacion de agua en el regadio: asignacion a traves de mercados, de la regla proporcional y de la regla uniforme," Economia Agraria y Recursos Naturales, Spanish Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 5(09), pages 1-24.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:earnsa:28770
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.28770
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/28770/files/05090115.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.28770?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Goetz, Renan U. & Martinez, Yolanda & Rodrigo, Jofre, 2008. "Water allocation by social choice rules: The case of sequential rules," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 304-314, April.
    2. J. Alarcón & L. Juana, 2016. "The Water Markets as Effective Tools of Managing Water Shortages in an Irrigation District," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(8), pages 2611-2625, June.
    3. Javier Alarcón & Alberto Garrido & Luis Juana, 2014. "Managing Irrigation Water Shortage: a Comparison Between Five Allocation Rules Based on Crop Benefit Functions," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(8), pages 2315-2329, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Resource /Energy Economics and Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:earnsa:28770. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aeeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.