IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/areint/355966.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancement of the market attractiveness and success of startups on the circular economy and sustainability principles

Author

Listed:
  • Kofanov, Oleksii
  • Kofanova, Olena
  • Tkachuk, Kostiantyn
  • Tverda, Oksana
  • Shostak, Inna

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of this study is to develop the methodology and the framework for assessing the level of environmental friendliness of startups in the agricultural sector and their compliance with the circular economy and sustainable development principles using T. L. Saaty’s analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to enhance their market attractiveness and success. Methodology / approach. The author’s methodology was created based on the AHP approach which is a comprehensive decision-making framework used to divide complex problems into a clear hierarchical structure. This approach enables the evaluation and comparison of multiple criteria facilitating informed decision-making. Calculations have been made in the RStudio. Results. The authors’ methodology and the framework for assessing the startups’ environmental friendliness and compliance with the circular economy and sustainability principles were created. The unique program was developed and executed in the RStudio using R programming language. The created methodology is based on the hierarchical criteria system consisting of three main criteria – “Compliance with the EU environmental standards and sustainability principles promotion”, “Compliance of the startups’ business model to the circular economy and sustainability principles”, and “Resource usage rationality” with the corresponding sub-criteria. It was determined that the first criterion has the highest impact on the startup eco-friendliness with a weight of 49.2 %, the second one has a weight of 28.7 %, and the third one – 22.1 %. The system of requirements for the AHP experts was also developed. Originality / scientific novelty. It was substantiated that the application of the original authors’ methodology and program enhance the startups’ market attractiveness and success by strengthening their brand image. The proposed solution facilitates the implementation of the circular economy and sustainability principles for innovative businesses, leading to improvements in environmental protection and waste management. Practical value / implications. The methodology has been tested on the example of the authors’ bioenergy startup for producing eco-friendly biofuels using agricultural and food industry wastes and minimising the usage of toxic substances. Based on the experts’ opinion and using the authors’ unique program it was calculated that the startup complies with the circular economy and sustainability principles and has an eco-friendly brand image with a 78.6 % probability.

Suggested Citation

  • Kofanov, Oleksii & Kofanova, Olena & Tkachuk, Kostiantyn & Tverda, Oksana & Shostak, Inna, 2024. "Enhancement of the market attractiveness and success of startups on the circular economy and sustainability principles," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 10(2), June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:areint:355966
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.355966
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/355966/files/7_Kofanov_article.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.355966?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wei Gu & Thomas L. Saaty & Lirong Wei, 2018. "Evaluating and Optimizing Technological Innovation Efficiency of Industrial Enterprises Based on Both Data and Judgments," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(01), pages 9-43, January.
    2. Simone Sehnem & Deivsson Souza Bispo & Jacinto Orlando João & Maria Aparecida Lima de Souza & Oscar Bertoglio & Rogério Ciotti & Simone Machado Deon, 2022. "Upscaling circular economy in foodtechs businesses in emergent countries: Towards sustainable development through natural resource based view," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(5), pages 1200-1221, October.
    3. Huang, Wei & Manevska-Tasevska, Gordana & Hansson, Helena, 2024. "Does ecologization matter for technical efficiency in crop production? A case of Swedish agriculture," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Skrynkovskyy, Ruslan & Pavlenchyk, Nataliia & Tsyuh, Svyatoslav & Zanevskyy, Ihor & Pavlenchyk, Anatoliі, 2022. "Economic-mathematical model of enterprise profit maximization in the system of sustainable development values," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 8(4), December.
    2. Naimur Rahman Chowdhury & Farhatul Janan & Priom Mahmud & Sharmine Akther Liza & Sanjoy Kumar Paul, 2024. "Assessing strategies to mitigate the impacts of a pandemic in apparel supply chains," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 38-54, March.
    3. Yaliu Yang & Yuan Wang & Cui Wang & Yingyan Zhang & Cuixia Zhang, 2022. "Temporal and Spatial Evolution of the Science and Technology Innovative Efficiency of Regional Industrial Enterprises: A Data-Driven Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-21, August.
    4. Xiaochen Zhou & Jijiao Jiang & Cong Zhou & Xiang Li & Ming Yin, 2024. "Circular supply chain management: Antecedent effect of social capital and big data analysis capability and their impact on sustainable performance," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(5), pages 5311-5330, October.
    5. He Huang & Liwei Zhong & Ting Shen & Huixin Wang, 2022. "Performance prediction and optimization for healthcare enterprises in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: an intelligent DEA-SVM model," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 44(5), pages 3778-3791, December.
    6. Modan Yan & Haiyun Liu, 2024. "The Impact of Digital Trade Barriers on Technological Innovation Efficiency and Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-19, June.
    7. Jaqueline Marchiore Petri & Antonio Carlos de Francisco & Adriano Martins de Souza & José Donizetti de Lima & Flavio Trojan, 2025. "How Do Start-Ups Develop Circular Business Models? A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-30, February.
    8. Zhao, Qi & Guo, Ming & Feng, Fangfang & Li, Junjun & Guan, Hangtian, 2024. "Path analysis of digital development on the green industrial transformation of Chinese resource-based enterprises," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    9. Guoqing Zhao & Shaofeng Liu & Carmen Lopez & Yi Wang & Haiyan Lu & Jinhua Zhang, 2024. "Identification, establishment of connection, and clustering of social risks involved in the agri-food supply chains: a cross-country comparative study," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 338(2), pages 1241-1282, July.
    10. Huang, Nianbing & Liu, Yu, 2024. "Structural tax reduction, financing constraint relief and enterprise innovation efficiency," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    11. Md. Abdul Moktadir & Jingzheng Ren, 2024. "Leveraging environmental, social, and governance strategies for sustainable tannery solid waste management towards achieving sustainable development goals," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 2869-2898, August.
    12. Ruggiero Sardaro & Daniela Panio & Paweł Chmieliński & Piermichele La Sala, 2024. "Efficiency of the Integrated Production Systems: Evidence from the Winegrowing Firms in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-16, June.
    13. Xinyu Cai & Hua Xiang & Inna Neskorоdieva & Akmal Durmanov, 2024. "Interrelation between human capital management and ESG engagement: evidence from S&P 500 firms," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, December.
    14. Xiongfeng Pan & Cuicui Han & Xiaowei Lu & Zhiming Jiao & Yang Ming, 2020. "Green innovation ability evaluation of manufacturing enterprises based on AHP–OVP model," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 409-419, July.
    15. Tadashi Hirai, 2022. "A balancing act between economic growth and sustainable development: Historical trajectory through the lens of development indicators," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 1900-1910, December.
    16. Satirenjit Kaur Johl & Kashif Ali & Kunio Shirahada & Oyelakin Idris Oyewale, 2024. "Green servitization, circular economy, and sustainability a winning combination analysis through hybrid SEM‐ANN approach," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(8), pages 8978-8993, December.
    17. Roman Meinhold & Christoph Wagner & Bablu Kumar Dhar, 2025. "Digital sustainability and eco‐environmental sustainability: A review of emerging technologies, resource challenges, and policy implications," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(2), pages 2323-2338, April.
    18. Ye‐Cheng Wang & Yi‐Pin Fan & Yuan‐Wei Du, 2023. "Ecological development practices of marine ranching enterprises in China: Case studies of early movers," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(5), pages 3207-3223, October.
    19. Chen Wang & Qingyan Yang & Shufen Dai, 2019. "Supplier Selection and Order Allocation under a Carbon Emission Trading Scheme: A Case Study from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-19, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Sustainability;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:areint:355966. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://are-journal.com/are .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.