IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/areint/355963.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of horticulture on the sustainable livelihood development of smallholders: a SPAR-4-SLR & future research agenda

Author

Listed:
  • Mukherjee, Debarshi
  • Jena, Lokesh Kumar
  • Chakraborty, Subhayan
  • Debnath, Ranjit
  • Hasan, Khandakar Kamrul

Abstract

Purpose. The perishable nature of the horticulture (fruits, vegetables, and flowers) industry makes it more complex to study. The higher return and nutritional benefits compared to traditional agricultural products expand the research scope for the stakeholders’ sustainable benefit. Nevertheless, despite limited research, this study explicitly examines additional facets of smallholder development beyond the traditional economic, social, and environmental dimensions. Methodology / approach. To fill this knowledge gap, we comprehensively reviewed 73 articles published between 2013 and 2022 in international scientific journals with an SJR (Scimago Journal & Country Rank) Q1 ranking. We followed the “Scientific Procedures and Rationales for Systematic Literature Reviews” (SPAR-4-SLR) protocol to identify different aspects of smallholders’ development. Literature from Web of Science and Scopus databases was analysed and organised using the TCCM (Theory, Context, Characteristics, and Methodology) framework. Results. The study identified important factors like infrastructure, commercialisation, market access, marketing, credit, policies, information, intervention, training, technology, and collaboration that could uncover crucial economic, political, social, psychological, ecological, cultural, physical and nutritional aspects of development in general. The study also suggests that implementation Agriculture 4.0 through advanced technologies like IoT, AI, and vertical and bio-fortification practices can help in sustainable livelihood development in horticulture. Originality / scientific novelty. The limited or lack of comprehensive studies on smallholders’ sustainable livelihood development with different dimensions makes this research a bridge to identify other dimensions instead of only focusing on the horticultural sector’s economic, social, and ecological aspects. It uses the Agricultural Innovation System and Farmer First theories, stating that the farmer is the first priority and must collaborate and interact to implement technology and innovations for smallholder livelihood development. Practical value / implications. This research will help in decision-making regarding smallholders’ livelihoods in all eight dimensions at all levels of government, private and other stakeholders, suggesting a triple-helix model.

Suggested Citation

  • Mukherjee, Debarshi & Jena, Lokesh Kumar & Chakraborty, Subhayan & Debnath, Ranjit & Hasan, Khandakar Kamrul, 2024. "Impact of horticulture on the sustainable livelihood development of smallholders: a SPAR-4-SLR & future research agenda," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 10(2), June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:areint:355963
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.355963
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/355963/files/4_Mukherjee_article.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.355963?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adam, Yahia Omar & Pretzsch, Jürgen & Pettenella, Davide, 2013. "Contribution of Non-Timber Forest Products livelihood strategies to rural development in drylands of Sudan: Potentials and failures," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 90-97.
    2. Jelili Adegboyega Adebiyi & Laura Schmitt Olabisi & Lin Liu & Dee Jordan, 2021. "Water–food–energy–climate nexus and technology productivity: a Nigerian case study of organic leafy vegetable production," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 6128-6147, April.
    3. Jelili Adegboyega Adebiyi & Laura Schmitt Olabisi & Lin Liu & Demetrice R. Jordan, 2021. "Correction to: Water–food–energy–climate nexus and technology productivity: a Nigerian case study of organic leafy vegetable production," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 9613-9613, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. B. Holmatov & J. Lautze & S. Uhlenbrook, 2023. "The nexus across water, energy and food (WEF): Learning from research, building on evidence, strengthening practice," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 47(4), pages 817-841, November.
    2. Shackleton, C.M. & Garekae, H. & Sardeshpande, M. & Sinasson Sanni, G. & Twine, W.C., 2024. "Non-timber forest products as poverty traps: Fact or fiction?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    3. Yifan Wang & He Li & Rong Zhao, 2022. "The Role of Forestry-Based Policies in Alleviating Relative Poverty in the Rocky Desertification Area in Southwest China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-14, November.
    4. Plummer, Paul & Andersson, Johnn & Lennerfors, Thomas Taro, 2024. "Foraging for development: An analysis of the Swedish wild berry innovation system," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    5. Babatunde Owolodun & Sonja Merten, 2023. "Food Security from the Forest: The Case of the Commodification of Baobab Fruit ( Adansonia digitata L.) in Boundou Region, Senegal," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, July.
    6. Hassan El-Ramady & Eric C. Brevik & Yousry Bayoumi & Tarek A. Shalaby & Mohammed E. El-Mahrouk & Naglaa Taha & Heba Elbasiouny & Fathy Elbehiry & Megahed Amer & Neama Abdalla & József Prokisch & Svein, 2022. "An Overview of Agro-Waste Management in Light of the Water-Energy-Waste Nexus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-30, November.
    7. Abbas Afshar & Elham Soleimanian & Hossein Akbari Variani & Masoud Vahabzadeh & Amir Molajou, 2022. "The conceptual framework to determine interrelations and interactions for holistic Water, Energy, and Food Nexus," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(8), pages 10119-10140, August.
    8. Copena, Damián & Pérez-Neira, David & Macías Vázquez, Alfredo & Simón, Xavier, 2022. "Community forest and mushrooms: Collective action initiatives in rural areas of Galicia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    9. D. Weyer & C. M. Shackleton & Y. O. Adam, 2018. "HIV/AIDS and other household shocks as catalysts of local commercialization of non†timber forest products in Southern Africa," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 36(S1), pages 285-301, March.
    10. Adam, Ismail Abdalla Abuelbashar & Adam, Yahia Omar & Olumeh, Dennis Etemesi & Mithöfer, Dagmar, 2024. "Livelihood strategies, baobab income and income inequality: Evidence from Kordofan and Blue Nile, Sudan," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    11. Swati Singh & Shresth Tayal, 2022. "Managing food at urban level through water–energy–food nexus in India: A way towards holistic sustainable development," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 3640-3658, March.
    12. Harun M. Kiruki & Emma H. Zanden & Patrick Kariuki & Peter H. Verburg, 2020. "The contribution of charcoal production to rural livelihoods in a semi-arid area in Kenya," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(7), pages 6931-6960, October.
    13. Roger R. B. Leakey & Marie-Louise Tientcheu Avana & Nyong Princely Awazi & Achille E. Assogbadjo & Tafadzwanashe Mabhaudhi & Prasad S. Hendre & Ann Degrande & Sithabile Hlahla & Leonard Manda, 2022. "The Future of Food: Domestication and Commercialization of Indigenous Food Crops in Africa over the Third Decade (2012–2021)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-75, February.
    14. Mazhar Biland & Alam Zeb & Ayat Ullah & Harald Kaechele, 2021. "Why Do Households Depend on the Forest for Income? Analysis of Factors Influencing Households’ Decision-Making Behaviors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-17, August.
    15. Kibria, Abu S.M.G. & Costanza, Robert & Gasparatos, Alexandros & Soto, José, 2022. "A composite human wellbeing index for ecosystem-dependent communities: A case study in the Sundarbans, Bangladesh," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    16. Mati Amano Geleto & Gerald Kapp & Elamin Sanjak, 2023. "Coping with local peoples' livelihood dependence on the transboundary Dinder–Alatish National Parks in Sudan and Ethiopia from the Sudanese Perspective," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 3099-3121, April.
    17. Adam, Y.O. & Eltayeb, A.M., 2016. "Forestry decentralization and poverty alleviation: A review," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 300-307.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Sustainability;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:areint:355963. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://are-journal.com/are .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.