IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ajaees/402809.html

Knowledge Level of Rural Youth towards ARYA Scheme: A Comparative Study of Beneficiaries and Non-beneficiaries in Kaushambi District of Uttar Pradesh, India

Author

Listed:
  • Singh, Jayati
  • Jahanara

Abstract

The present study was conducted in Kaushambi District of Uttar Pradesh state during 2023-24. To study the knowledge level of farmers about the ARYA scheme of the region by using Purposive Sampling techniques in Kaushambi district, constituting a total sample of 320 respondents, amongst which 160 are beneficiaries and 160 are non-beneficiaries of the scheme. It was inferred from the research that among the beneficiaries,48.75 per cent had a high level of knowledge, followed by a medium level of knowledge, i.e. 31.88. In contrast, 40.62 per cent of non-beneficiaries had a medium level of knowledge, followed by low level of knowledge, i.e. 36.26 per cent. For a claim that suggests ARYA schemes help to improve “Skills” in Rural Youth 45.62 per cent had a high level of knowledge, whereas among non-beneficiaries it was found to be 20.00 per cent. The finding suggests that while ARYA scheme has made an impression in terms of general awareness and its focus on skill development, significant gaps remain in the understanding of its financial provisions and other relevant information. The findings of the study have important implications for extension agencies, policymakers, and implementing institutions. The study underscores the significance of need-based trainings, effective communication channels, and follow-up to strengthen existing knowledge gaps, particularly to financial aspect and entrepreneurial components.

Suggested Citation

  • Singh, Jayati & Jahanara, 2026. "Knowledge Level of Rural Youth towards ARYA Scheme: A Comparative Study of Beneficiaries and Non-beneficiaries in Kaushambi District of Uttar Pradesh, India," Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, vol. 44(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ajaees:402809
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/402809/files/Singh4412025AJAEES150357.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tatjana Borojević & Nataša Petrović & Jelena Andreja Radaković & Hajdana Glomazić & Milan Radojičić & Nemanja Milenković & Damjan Maletič & Matjaž Maletič, 2023. "Youth Participation for Sustainable Value Creation: The Role and Prioritization of SDGs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Rocco Addorisio & Roberta Spadoni & Giulia Maesano, 2025. "Adoption of Innovative Technologies for Sustainable Agriculture: A Scoping Review of the System Domain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-28, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Migliorini, Laura & Olcese, Martina & Cardinali, Paola & Madera, Francesco, 2026. "Exploring outdoor initiatives as tools for youth engagement, inclusion, and environmental awareness: a multi-case study from Italy and France," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    2. Norberto T. Gonzales Jr. & Irish E. Flores, 2026. "Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Awareness and the Level of Civic Engagement among Public Senior High School Students in Division of Olongapo City," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 10(4), pages 5274-5297, April.
    3. Julia Urquijo‐Reguera & José Carlos Illán Sailer & Miquel Trobat Llompart & Ramon Canal Oliveras, 2025. "A methodology for prioritizing sustainable development goals targets at the local level: The case of Barcelona City Council," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(2), pages 2292-2308, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ajaees:402809. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journalajaees.com/index.php/AJAEES/index .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.