IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ajaees/367857.html

An Applied Group-centric Approach for Empowering Banana Farmer's Agripreneurial Culture

Author

Listed:
  • Chandran, Revathy
  • Thomas, Allan

Abstract

Agripreneurship is a dynamic strategy which enables farmers to generate sustainable income and thereby providing economic benefits to farmers. In the pursuit of sustainable agriculture, agripreneurship emerges as a dynamic strategy, empowering farmers to cultivate not only crops but also a reliable stream of income. This study explores the transformative impact of agripreneurship ventures on banana farming in Chirakkara Panchayat, Kerala. Through participatory action and learning, a heptalogical model was developed, addressing identified constraints in three phases: constraint identification, intervention, and market analysis. The study engaged 10 farmers with a minimum of three years of experience, strategically chosen from Krishi Bhavan clusters and VFPCK groups. The intervention focused on value addition, introducing products like banana jam and pseudostem squash. Results indicate a positive shift in the economic landscape, with the sale of 355 bottles of squash and 260 bottles of jam generating a profit of Rs. 11,219 and a favorable Benefit-to-Cost ratio of 1.36 achieved in a short sales period (13 weeks). Market analysis demonstrated weekly, monthly, and cumulative sales trends. Simulation scenarios based on actual sales and a 20% increase in quantity, cost, and returns projected promising outcomes. Simulation based on the actual sales yielded a net return of Rs. 1,34,628 per year, while the simulation with increased parameters suggested potential net returns of Rs. 1,61,554 per year, emphasizing the agripreneurial success potential. The agripreneurial model, aligned with the heptalogical model of entrepreneurship, proved relevant in areas where banana prices are low. The success in Chirakkara inspired confidence in the farming community, fostering diversification and product expansion based on seasonal inputs. In conclusion, the study highlights the significant impact of participatory action and learning in transforming banana farming. The success achieved in Chirakkara provides a scalable blueprint for the broader implementation of agripreneurial models, showcasing the potential for holistic economic development and improved livelihoods for banana farmers.

Suggested Citation

  • Chandran, Revathy & Thomas, Allan, 2023. "An Applied Group-centric Approach for Empowering Banana Farmer's Agripreneurial Culture," Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, vol. 41(12), pages 1-5.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ajaees:367857
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/367857/files/Chandran41122023AJAEES110917.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zoltan Acs & David Audretsch, 1990. "Innovation and Small Firms," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262011131, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carreira, Carlos & Teixeira, Paulino, 2011. "Entry and exit as a source of aggregate productivity growth in two alternative technological regimes," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 135-150, June.
    2. Wright Mike & Zahra Shaker, 2011. "The Other Side of Paradise: Examining the Dark Side of Entrepreneurship," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 1(3), pages 1-7, July.
    3. Younsuk Park & Jaeun Shin & Taejong Kim, 2010. "Firm size, age, industrial networking, and growth: a case of the Korean manufacturing industry," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 153-168, September.
    4. Michael Fritsch & Viktor Slavtchev, 2007. "What determines the efficiency of regional innovation systems?," Jena Economics Research Papers 2007-006, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    5. Nawal Abdalla Adam & Hind Alofaysan, 2023. "External Knowledge Flows and Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises’ Innovation Capabilities Enhancement: An Empirical Investigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-14, February.
    6. Talat Mahmood, 1997. "Survival of Newly Founded Businesses: A Log-Logistic Model Approach," CIG Working Papers FS IV 97-32, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin (WZB), Research Unit: Competition and Innovation (CIG).
    7. Irani Arráiz & Marcela Melendez & Rodolfo Stucchi, 2012. "Partial Credit Guarantees and Firm Performance: Evidence from the Colombian National Guarantee Fund," OVE Working Papers 0212, Inter-American Development Bank, Office of Evaluation and Oversight (OVE).
    8. Werner, Arndt, 2008. "Do Credit Constraints Matter more for College Dropout Entrepreneurs?," MPRA Paper 11867, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Masatoshi Kato & Hiroyuki Okamuro & Yuji Honjo, 2015. "Does Founders' Human Capital Matter for Innovation? Evidence from Japanese Start‐ups," Journal of Small Business Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(1), pages 114-128, January.
    10. Andrea Vaona & Mario Pianta, 2008. "Firm Size and Innovation in European Manufacturing," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 283-299, March.
    11. José A Belso Martínez, 2009. "Entrepreneurship Policies and New Business Performance and Growth: An Empirical Analysis Based on Manufacturing Industries," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 27(2), pages 195-215, April.
    12. Cristiano Antonelli & Alessandra Colombelli, 2017. "The locus of knowledge externalities and the cost of knowledge," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(8), pages 1151-1164, August.
    13. Victor & CHEN, 2025. "Beyond Patents: R&D, Capital, and the Productivity Puzzle in Early-Stage High-Tech Firms," Papers 2507.18227, arXiv.org.
    14. Andreas Koch & Harald Strotmann, 2006. "Determinants of Innovative Activity in Newly Founded Knowledge Intensive Business Service Firms," International Studies in Entrepreneurship, in: Michael Fritsch & Juergen Schmude (ed.), Entrepreneurship in the Region, chapter 10, pages 195-224, Springer.
    15. Zahra, Shaker A., 1996. "Technology strategy and new venture performance: A study of corporate-sponsored and independent biotechnology ventures," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 289-321, July.
    16. Fritsch, Michael, 2008. "Die Arbeitsplatzeffekte von Gründungen : ein Überblick über den Stand der Forschung (The employment effects of new businesses : a survey of the current state of research)," Zeitschrift für ArbeitsmarktForschung - Journal for Labour Market Research, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany], vol. 41(1), pages 55-69.
    17. repec:dgr:rugsom:98b19 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Tether, B. S., 1998. "Small and large firms: sources of unequal innovations?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(7), pages 725-745, November.
    19. Enrico Guzzini & Donato Iacobucci, 2014. "Ownership as R&D incentive in business groups," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 119-135, June.
    20. Fontana, Roberto & Nuvolari, Alessandro & Shimizu, Hiroshi & Vezzulli, Andrea, 2013. "Reassessing patent propensity: Evidence from a dataset of R&D awards, 1977–2004," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(10), pages 1780-1792.
    21. Jun Yan & Li Yan, 2016. "Individual entrepreneurship, collective entrepreneurship and innovation in small business: an empirical study," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 1053-1077, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ajaees:367857. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journalajaees.com/index.php/AJAEES/index .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.