IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ajaees/357064.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Analysis of the Agriculture Land Price Assessment in Albania

Author

Listed:
  • Taka, Alda
  • Doko, Adrian
  • Kopali, Albert
  • Musabelliu, Bari
  • Veselaj, Eriola
  • Malltezi, Jamarbër
  • Sulçe, Sulejman

Abstract

The common worldwide practice for agricultural land valuation is based on average market prices of the similar plots, close to the land being evaluated. However, the land valuation based on average market prices requires the functioning of a well-developed market for land sale/purchase transactions. Several reasons have limited the number of transactions which could serve as a base for setting a price for agricultural, pasture and forest land in many parts of Albania. In the absence of a land market, during a period of time (between 1990 and 2012), it was advisable to apply indirect land evaluation methodologies in the country. The principle of this method is net profit capitalization for which some parameters need to be calculated. The profit was calculated based on the yield, the cost of production and income of the unit surface. The direct land valuation method which is more commonly used in Albania since 2012, is based on the market value – a method used in developed countries where the high number of transactions and relative transparency of price are considered the most important. This study is focused in finding the differences and gaps between the direct and indirect methods of land valuation taking into account the numerous variables of climate and land, including the land use, agronomic potential expressed in the categories of land, commodity agricultural prices, rent, yield, crop structures, social issues and economic policies. To find the gaps and the advantages of different methods of land price in Albania this survey analyzed and compared the prices based on three well known international methods: directly-based on market price method, indirectly-based on ground rent and net profit capitalization. Comparing the values between regions the three methods showed many differences; the value of agricultural land prices were higher in Fier and Korça while it was lower in Berat according to net profit and rent capitalization methods. Farmland prices were the highest when market price method was applied, followed by rent capitalization method and lower for net profit method. The values according to three methods were higher than average land prices in the EU countries. The land values in Albania varied between 20,000 and 37,000 Euros ha-1.

Suggested Citation

  • Taka, Alda & Doko, Adrian & Kopali, Albert & Musabelliu, Bari & Veselaj, Eriola & Malltezi, Jamarbër & Sulçe, Sulejman, 2017. "Comparative Analysis of the Agriculture Land Price Assessment in Albania," Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, vol. 20(3).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ajaees:357064
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/357064/files/Doko2032017AJAEES37275.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Feichtinger, Paul & Salhofer, Klaus, "undated". "The Valuation of Agricultural Land and the Influence of Government Payments," Working papers 119103, Factor Markets, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Letort, Élodie & Temesgen, Chalachew, 2014. "Influence of environmental policies on farmland prices in the Bretagne region of France," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement (RAEStud), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 95(01).
    2. Rutkauskas Virgilijus & Gudauskaitė Laura, 2018. "Explaining the Changes of Agriculture Land Prices in Lithuania," Ekonomika (Economics), Sciendo, vol. 97(1), pages 63-75, January.
    3. Saguatti, Annachiara & Erickson, Kenneth & Gutierrez, Luciano, 2014. "Spatial panel models for the analysis of land prices," 2014 Third Congress, June 25-27, 2014, Alghero, Italy 172997, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA).
    4. Schmidtner, Eva & Dabbert, Stephan & Lippert, Christian, . "Do Different Measurements of Soil Quality Influence the Results of a Ricardian Analysis? – A Case Study on the Effects of Climate Change on German Agriculture," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 64(02).
    5. Hansen, Marc & Conteh, Mohamed & Shakya, Martina & Löwenstein, Wilhelm, 2016. "Determining Minimum Compensation for Lost Farmland: a theory-based impact evaluation of a land grab in Sierra Leone," IEE Working Papers 211, Ruhr University Bochum, Institute of Development Research and Development Policy (IEE).
    6. Elena Bykowa & Tatyana Banikevich, 2025. "Relationship Between the Integral Indicator of Soil Quality and the Cadastral Value of Agricultural Lands," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-22, April.
    7. Niskanen, Olli, "undated". "Accounting for risk in farm investment calculations: application to dairy farm investment," 156th Seminar, October 4, 2016, Wageningen, The Netherlands 249988, European Association of Agricultural Economists.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ajaees:357064. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journalajaees.com/index.php/AJAEES/index .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.