IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/aesjre/242298.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transition of Consumer's Evaluation on Radioactive Contamination of Agricultural Products in Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Ujiie, Kiyokazu

Abstract

On March 11, 2011, the Great Eastern Japan Earthquake wreaked havoc across northeastern Japan. The disaster caused a serious nuclear accident at the Fukushima I Nuclear Power Plant, which led to radiation leakage across northern and eastern Japan. Concerns over the radioactive contamination of food have grown among consumers since the accident. The Japanese government has issued certain legal guidelines for withdrawing food from markets. However, the demand for agricultural products from Fukushima Prefecture and neighboring areas decreased because of contamination concerns. In this paper, the research estimated consumer WTA of spinach from Fukushima and Ibaraki prefectures using the data collected by internet surveys conducted from March 2011 to February 2012 of married women living in the Tokyo and Osaka metropolitan areas. In the estimate this research divided the WTA into two parts: 1) health risk evaluation, the evaluation of products based on health risk from radioactive contamination, and 2) origin evaluation, based on the origin of products without contamination. The main results are as follows: (1) Consumer evaluations were different between the Tokyo and Osaka metropolitan areas. The health risk evaluation was similar in both areas; however, the origin evaluation was different between the areas. (2) Level of contamination-WTA curves should be concave and the effect of the change of level of contamination diminishes gradually. The results indicate that consumers' evasion toward agricultural food with fear of contamination is still strong and sticky.

Suggested Citation

  • Ujiie, Kiyokazu, 2013. "Transition of Consumer's Evaluation on Radioactive Contamination of Agricultural Products in Japan," Journal of Rural Economics, Agricultural Economics Society of Japan, vol. 85(3), pages 1-9, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aesjre:242298
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.242298
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/242298/files/Ujiie-13.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.242298?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shigeru Matsumoto & Viet‐Ngu Hoang, 2020. "Economic Loss Due to Reputation Damage: A New Model and Its Application to Fukushima Peaches," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(2), pages 581-600, June.
    2. Dimitrios Dadakas & Stavroula Tatsi, 2021. "Global agricultural trade impact of the 2011 triple disaster in Japan: A gravity approach," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 65(4), pages 937-972, October.
    3. Tajima, Kayo & Yamamoto, Masashi & Ichinose, Daisuke, 2016. "How do agricultural markets respond to radiation risk? Evidence from the 2011 disaster in Japan," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 20-30.
    4. Shigeru Matsumoto & Viet Ngu Hoang, 2018. "How is internal radiation exposure risk evaluated at the markets? Perceived quality degradation of Fukushima peach," Working Papers e122, Tokyo Center for Economic Research.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Risk and Uncertainty;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aesjre:242298. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aesjjea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.