IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Analyzing Agile Development – from Waterfall Style to Scrumban

Listed author(s):
  • Marian STOICA


  • Bogdan GHILIC-MICU


  • Marinela MIRCEA


  • Cristian USCATU


Registered author(s):

    The spectacular evolution of information and communications technology in the last two decades and the growing obvious chase of utopian maximization of profit by economic organizations have made an impact on various fields, including that of methodological instruments regarding the lifecycle of software development. We will speak about the necessity of organizational ability to adapt to continuously changing market conditions, which leads undoubtedly to acquiring functional flexibility and, in the end, of business agility. Also, the agility of a business (not only in software development) is supported by the manifestation of agility on all three architectural levels: business, informational, technological. In this study we aim to identify the elements that impact on agility in developing software products, in a gradual approach, from the traditional waterfall model towards approaches like Scrumban. Additionally, we will understand the social dimension of using agile methodologies in software development projects and the main barriers in adopting such methodologies.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:,%20Ghilic,%20Mircea,%20Uscatu.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania in its journal Informatica Economica.

    Volume (Year): 20 (2016)
    Issue (Month): 4 ()
    Pages: 5-14

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:aes:infoec:v:20:y:2016:i:4:p:5-14
    Contact details of provider: Postal:

    Phone: 0040-01-2112650
    Fax: 0040-01-3129549
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    in new window

    1. Marian STOICA & Marinela MIRCEA & Bogdan GHILIC-MICU, 2013. "Software Development: Agile vs. Traditional," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 17(4), pages 64-76.
    2. Bogdan GHILIC-MICU & Marian STOICA & Cristian Razvan USCATU, 2014. "Cloud Computing and Agile Organization Development," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 18(4), pages 5-13.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:infoec:v:20:y:2016:i:4:p:5-14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Paul Pocatilu)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.