IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

The Process Of Decentralization In Bulgaria And The Necessity Of Introducing Regional Self-Government

Listed author(s):
  • Yuliyana Chavdarova Galabinova


    (Centre for Public Administration, New Bulgarian University,)

Registered author(s):

    In the recent years many Central and Eastern European Countries (CEEC) are re-arranging their regional levels of administration. After the political transition, the newly established democratic governments and parliaments focused on the establishment of local self-governments and local political elites with democratic legitimacy. This led to formation of accountable and relatively autonomous local self-governments in Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Poland, Slovenia, and Slovakia. It has been only since the mid-nineties that the regional level of government has received more attention in the CEE. To date, Bulgaria and Estonia are the only countries which have not established legal prerequisites for self-governments at the regional level. Regions are an integral part of the state administration in both countries, although county assemblies in Estonia facilitate a participation of the delegates of local self-governments at the regional level. In the process of the decentralization in Bulgaria the role of the regions (regional administrations) and the role of the state functions with regional meaning were undervalued. The concept for decentralization is based basically on the traditional understanding of the process as a transfer of power and resources from the national to the local level.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania in its journal The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal.

    Volume (Year): 8 (2006)
    Issue (Month): 19 (February)
    Pages: 91-99

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:8:y:2006:i:19:p:91-99
    Contact details of provider: Postal:

    Phone: 0040-01-2112650
    Fax: 0040-01-3129549
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:8:y:2006:i:19:p:91-99. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Valentin Dumitru)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.