IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/amfeco/v37y2014i16p965.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Research and Development for Business Innovations in Lithuania

Author

Listed:
  • Dalia Streimikiene

    (Vilnius University)

Abstract

The paper aims to assess the impact of research and development on innovativeness of the country as research and development is one of the main drivers of economic development and creation of modern knowledge based economy stipulating efficient use of natural resources and reducing negative impact on environment. The paper analyzes the main Lithuanian policy documents aiming at promotion of knowledge economy, innovations and research and development and financing of research, technological development and innovation. The programmes aiming at modernization of enterprises and trends of sustainable industrial development in Lithuania are critically reviewed. The Summary Innovation Index (SII) of Lithuania was applied to assess the impact of implementing policies promoting research and development in Lithuania. The analysis indicated that one of the main factors determining the relatively low Lithuanian SII is the insufficient level of investment in research and development (R&D). While R&D expenditure in the general government and higher education sectors corresponds to the EU average, it remains low in the business sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Dalia Streimikiene, 2014. "The Impact of Research and Development for Business Innovations in Lithuania," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 16(37), pages 965-965, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:37:y:2014:i:16:p:965
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.amfiteatrueconomic.ro/temp/Article_1327.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Professor Richard Welford, 1993. "Breaking the link between quality and the environment: Auditing for sustainability and life cycle assessment," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 2(4), pages 25-33, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dejan Ravšelj & Aleksander Aristovnik, 2018. "The Impact of Private Research and Development Expenditures and Tax Incentives on Sustainable Corporate Growth in Selected OECD Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mark Stubbs, 2000. "Action, knowledge and business–environment research: a case for grounded constitutive process theories and a sense of audience," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(1), pages 24-35, January.
    2. Hanna Nilsson‐Lindén & Magnus Rosén & Henrikke Baumann, 2019. "Product chain collaboration for sustainability: A business case for life cycle management," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(8), pages 1619-1631, December.
    3. Ian Rankin Kerr, 2006. "Leadership strategies for sustainable SME operation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(1), pages 30-39, January.
    4. Janne Hukkinen, 1995. "Green virus: Exploring the environmental product concept," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 4(3), pages 135-144, July.
    5. Lassi Linnanen, 1995. "Life cycle management: Integrated approach towards corporate environmental issues," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 4(3), pages 117-127, July.
    6. Paul Shrivastava & Stuart Hart, 1995. "Creating sustainable corporations," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 4(3), pages 154-165, July.
    7. S. J. Fowler & C. Hope, 2007. "Incorporating sustainable business practices into company strategy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(1), pages 26-38, January.
    8. Ulrich Steger, 1996. "Managerial Issues In Closing The Loop," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(4), pages 252-268, December.
    9. Priyanka Garg, 2017. "Development of sustainability reporting index (SRI) with special reference to companies in India," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 44(4), pages 259-273, December.
    10. Ramus, Catherine A., 2002. "Encouraging innovative environmental actions: what companies and managers must do," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 151-164, July.
    11. Charika Channuntapipat, 2021. "Can sustainability report assurance be a collaborative process and practice beyond the ritual of verification?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 775-786, February.
    12. Mohammed Solaiman & Ataur Rahman Belal, 1999. "An account of the sustainable development process in Bangladesh," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 7(3), pages 121-131.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    research and development; sustainable industrial development; modernization of enterprises; innovation index;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L2 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior
    • L26 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Entrepreneurship
    • L53 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - Enterprise Policy
    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D
    • O35 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Social Innovation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:37:y:2014:i:16:p:965. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Valentin Dumitru (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.