IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/amfeco/v27y2025i70p939.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Double Materiality in Sustainability Reporting: Revealing ESG-SDGs Connections for Businesses Awareness

Author

Listed:
  • Camelia Iuliana Lungu

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Chirata Caraiani

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Andreea Madalina Bojan

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Cornelia Dascalu

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Raluca Andreea Achim

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

The aim of this research is to investigate the concept of double materiality embedded in sustainability reporting requirements that address both business and society perspectives. In light of stakeholder, legitimacy, and institutional theories, this document explores how environmental, social, and governance (ESG) policies and practices (financial materiality) included in a business strategy may be related to incentives for companies to prioritise Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) (impact materiality). The data are collected from the Refinitiv Eikon database for nonfinancial international companies, over the 2015-2024 period. Parametric and nonparametric tests for differences in means, correlation analysis, and fixed effects robust regressions are employed to validate three research hypotheses. The results illustrate significant differences on financial and impact perspectives of materiality in European Union (EU) companies, as compared to non-EU companies. Strong associations between ESG scores and SDGs are identified and discussed using the double materiality approach. SDGs prioritisation in general, but also mapped for environmental, social, and governance, is found to have mixed impacts on ESG policies and practices. The findings support the hypothesis that prioritisation of the SDGs may ensure a balance among divergent interests of managers, investors, and other stakeholders. The study has academic and practical contributions to management decisions that integrate sustainable development goals to expand businesses' awareness of sustainability reporting requirements.

Suggested Citation

  • Camelia Iuliana Lungu & Chirata Caraiani & Andreea Madalina Bojan & Cornelia Dascalu & Raluca Andreea Achim, 2025. "Double Materiality in Sustainability Reporting: Revealing ESG-SDGs Connections for Businesses Awareness," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 27(70), pages 939-939, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:27:y:2025:i:70:p:939
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.amfiteatrueconomic.ro/temp/Article_3452.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting
    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:27:y:2025:i:70:p:939. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Valentin Dumitru (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.