IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aea/apandp/v109y2019p403-08.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differential Privacy and Census Data: Implications for Social and Economic Research

Author

Listed:
  • Steven Ruggles
  • Catherine Fitch
  • Diana Magnuson
  • Jonathan Schroeder

Abstract

The Census Bureau has announced new methods for disclosure control in public use data products. The new approach, known as differential privacy, represents a radical departure from current practice. In its pure form, differential privacy techniques may make the release of useful microdata impossible and limit the utility of tabular small-area data. Adoption of differential privacy will have far-reaching consequences for research. It is likely that scientists, planners, and the public will lose the free access we have enjoyed for six decades to reliable public Census Bureau data describing US social and economic change.

Suggested Citation

  • Steven Ruggles & Catherine Fitch & Diana Magnuson & Jonathan Schroeder, 2019. "Differential Privacy and Census Data: Implications for Social and Economic Research," AEA Papers and Proceedings, American Economic Association, vol. 109, pages 403-408, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:aea:apandp:v:109:y:2019:p:403-08
    Note: DOI: 10.1257/pandp.20191107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/pandp.20191107
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/pandp.20191107.ds
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michler, Jeffrey D. & Josephson, Anna & Kilic, Talip & Murray, Siobhan, 2022. "Privacy protection, measurement error, and the integration of remote sensing and socioeconomic survey data," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    2. John M. Abowd & Ian M. Schmutte & William Sexton & Lars Vilhuber, 2019. "Suboptimal Provision of Privacy and Statistical Accuracy When They are Public Goods," Papers 1906.09353, arXiv.org.
    3. Christine P. Chai, 2022. "Christine P. Chai's contribution to the Discussion of ‘Gaussian Differential Privacy’ by Dong et al," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 84(1), pages 43-44, February.
    4. J. Tom Mueller & Alexis R. Santos-Lozada, 2022. "The 2020 US Census Differential Privacy Method Introduces Disproportionate Discrepancies for Rural and Non-White Populations," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 41(4), pages 1417-1430, August.
    5. James Gaboardi, 2020. "Validating Abstract Representations of Spatial Population Data while considering Disclosure Avoidance," Working Papers 20-05, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    6. Sigurd Dyrting & Abraham Flaxman & Ethan Sharygin, 2022. "Reconstruction of age distributions from differentially private census data," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 41(6), pages 2311-2329, December.
    7. Hou, Bohan, 2021. "A Novel Data Governance Scheme Based on the Behavioral Economics Theory," SocArXiv 2b9dc, Center for Open Science.
    8. Cinzia Carota & Maurizio Filippone & Silvia Polettini, 2022. "Assessing Bayesian Semi‐Parametric Log‐Linear Models: An Application to Disclosure Risk Estimation," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 90(1), pages 165-183, April.
    9. Beth Jarosz, 2021. "Poisson Distribution: A Model for Estimating Households by Household Size," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 40(2), pages 149-162, April.
    10. Arthur Acolin & Ari Decter-Frain & Matt Hall, 2022. "Small-area estimates from consumer trace data," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 47(27), pages 843-882.
    11. James Gaboardi, 2020. "Validating Abstract Representations of Spatial Population Data while considering Disclosure Avoidance," Working Papers 20-5, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C81 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Methodology for Collecting, Estimating, and Organizing Microeconomic Data; Data Access

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aea:apandp:v:109:y:2019:p:403-08. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Michael P. Albert (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aeaaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.