IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Market and Welfare Effects of Big Box Retail Entry in a Linear City Model with Oligopolistic Competition

Listed author(s):
  • Rasha Ahmed


  • Mark Stater


  • Michael S. Visser


Registered author(s):

    We model the entry of a big box retailer into a closed monocentric city with an existing CBD retailer. The big box produces a lower quality good and has an efficiency advantage over the downtown firm. We find that while the big box charges a lower price, it may produce more or less output, and hire more or fewer workers, than the downtown retailer. Its entry may also increase or decrease local retail employment, depending on key parameters. We show that the big box?s profit-maximizing location is closer to the CBD than the utility-maximizing point. The socially optimal location is even farther from the CBD than the utility-maximizing location if the substitutability between goods is low enough and the scale of the big box is large enough. This suggests a welfare rationale for zoning rules that prevent big boxes from moving too close to city centers, but under the opposite parameter conditions the socially optimal location can actually be downtown, in which case incentives may be needed to lure the big box closer to the center.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by GENES in its journal Annals Of Economics and Statistics.

    Volume (Year): (2017)
    Issue (Month): 127 ()
    Pages: 123-161

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:adr:anecst:y:2017:i:127:p:123-161
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    3, avenue Pierre Larousse, 92245 Malakoff Cedex

    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adr:anecst:y:2017:i:127:p:123-161. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Laurent Linnemer)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.